2016
DOI: 10.1002/joc.4852
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing reference evapotranspiration estimation from reanalysis weather products. An application to the Iberian Peninsula

Abstract: Computing crop reference evapotranspiration (ETo) with the FAO Penman–Monteith method (PM‐ETo) requires maximum and minimum air temperature, shortwave radiation, relative air humidity and wind speed. These data are often not available, thus requiring alternative computation procedures. Although some proposed approximations may provide ETo values with small estimation errors, the physics of the ET processes may then not be well described. The use of reanalysis data, which is common in climate studies, represent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
1
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Climate reanalyses are reconstruction of past climate through the blending of observations with numerical models that are spatially and temporally complete, they are thus produced from a consistent physical representation of the climate processes. On the other hand, reanalyses are known to be biased relative to observations in a magnitude that varies locally (Li et al, 2013;Jones et al, 2017;Martins et al, 2017). Recently, reanalyses have been used to provide target distributions for statistical postprocessing of climate simulations (Grenier, 2018) and to force hydrologic models during calibration (Fuka et al, 2014;Lauri et al, 2014).…”
Section: Methodology Quantile Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Climate reanalyses are reconstruction of past climate through the blending of observations with numerical models that are spatially and temporally complete, they are thus produced from a consistent physical representation of the climate processes. On the other hand, reanalyses are known to be biased relative to observations in a magnitude that varies locally (Li et al, 2013;Jones et al, 2017;Martins et al, 2017). Recently, reanalyses have been used to provide target distributions for statistical postprocessing of climate simulations (Grenier, 2018) and to force hydrologic models during calibration (Fuka et al, 2014;Lauri et al, 2014).…”
Section: Methodology Quantile Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NSE is a normalized statistics that determines the relative magnitude of residual variance (noise) compared to the measured data variance (information) (Nash and Sutcliffe, 1970; Martins et al , 2017). In other words, it indicates the relative magnitude of the mean square error (MSE) and the observed data variance (Legates and McCabe Jr, 1999).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Forced To the Origin (FTO) (Eisenhauer, 2003) linear regression is defined by y = b 0 x between predicted ( y ) and observed ( x ) values. This model assumes proportionality between NEX‐GDDP and in‐situ values; b o being the constant of proportionality where b o > 1 denotes overestimation and b o < 1 indicates underestimation (Martins et al , 2017). The b o is determined as follows: b0=normali=1MOiPinormali=1MnormalOnormali2 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, in this study, data reanalysis and observation of the POWER project of NASA Langley Research Center (LaRC) funded by the NASA Earth Science/Applied Science program (https://power.larc.nasa.gov/data-accessviewer, accessed on 20 December 2018) were used as an alternative to observed data that are inaccessible and generally scattered [44,46]. These data, already used and validated in previous studies [47][48][49], have the advantage of having spatial and temporal coverage on a global scale [46,[50][51][52] and provide the climatic variables necessary for the estimation of evapotranspiration [46,53]. These datasets which result from satellite and model-derived weather data contain uncertainties however, and where possible these should be evaluated and validated locally against available in situ measurements [54].…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%