2012
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/7/1/014031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing REDD+ performance of countries with low monitoring capacities: the matrix approach

Abstract: Estimating emissions from deforestation and degradation of forests in many developing countries is so uncertain that the effects of changes in forest management could remain within error ranges (i.e. undetectable) for several years. Meanwhile UNFCCC Parties need consistent time series of meaningful performance indicators to set credible benchmarks and allocate REDD+ incentives to the countries, programs and activities that actually reduce emissions, while providing social and environmental benefits. Introducin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
67
0
7

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
67
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The measurement of forest area and forest area change is being advanced through better coverage and accessibility of remote sensing imagery (Achard et al 2004, Mayaux et al 2005, Ramankutty et al 2007, Goetz et al 2009, Baker et al 2010. It is increasingly being used to infer forest carbon stocks over large spatial scales, although limitations still exist in linking imagery to on-the-ground data and in the ability to monitor forest degradation and carbon stored in deadwood and litter (Baccini et al 2008, Baker et al 2010, Bucki et al 2012. Discussions are ongoing to develop and agree on methods to establish past and predicted future rates of deforestation from which the emission reductions of an intervention can be estimated (Angelsen 2008, Olander et al 2008, Bond et al 2009, Griscom et al 2009, Huettner et al 2009, Estrada 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measurement of forest area and forest area change is being advanced through better coverage and accessibility of remote sensing imagery (Achard et al 2004, Mayaux et al 2005, Ramankutty et al 2007, Goetz et al 2009, Baker et al 2010. It is increasingly being used to infer forest carbon stocks over large spatial scales, although limitations still exist in linking imagery to on-the-ground data and in the ability to monitor forest degradation and carbon stored in deadwood and litter (Baccini et al 2008, Baker et al 2010, Bucki et al 2012. Discussions are ongoing to develop and agree on methods to establish past and predicted future rates of deforestation from which the emission reductions of an intervention can be estimated (Angelsen 2008, Olander et al 2008, Bond et al 2009, Griscom et al 2009, Huettner et al 2009, Estrada 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Below we address these questions, summarizing and further discussing several refinements to the implementation of the conservativeness principle, partly already presented in Bucki et al (2012).…”
Section: Different Approaches To Implementing Convervativeness Lead Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that forest change is a dynamic process, monitoring needs to be carried out on a regular basis to support national MRV requirements. Establishing such monitoring systems is presumed to be expensive for developing countries [8,[11][12][13]. An activity monitoring system should be based on four broad monitoring objectives related to the location, area, time and drivers of forest change.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%