Assessing Red Drum Juvenile Stocking in a South Carolina Estuary Using Genetic Identification

Abstract

The South Carolina Department of Natural Resources has been stocking red drum Sciaenops ocellatus since 1988 to evaluate parameters critical to their successful survival and recruitment in South Carolina estuaries. From 1999 to 2002, between 600,000 and 1,000,000 juvenile red drum were stocked each year in two tributaries of Charleston Harbor. The harbor and each tributary were partitioned into three independent strata and randomly sampled monthly for two decades, allowing population trends before, during, and after stocking to be evaluated. Using microsatellitebased parentage analysis, we examined the contribution of stocked age-0 juvenile red drum (15-60 mm total length) to the local population 1 year after release by using fishery-independent sampling. Analysis of these data showed that the highest contributions (88.9%) were close to the stocking site in years with low natural recruitment, whereas in years with high natural recruitment, contributions were lower and stocking was less effective in increasing catch per unit effort. The results of stocking 600,000 small juveniles/year from 1999 to 2001 in one of the study tributaries (Ashley River) indicated that stocked fish did not displace wild fish but had an additive effect on their abundance, supporting the hypothesis that trophic resources are not limiting for postlarval age-0 red drum within Charleston Harbor. The high observed variability in contribution among years of stocking similar-sized red drum suggests that (1) interpretation on a year-class-specific basis is necessary to fully understand the effects of stocking and (2) marine stock enhancement programs would benefit substantially from evaluation in the context of wild annual recruitment patterns.

Ocean's eleven: a critical evaluation of the role of population, evolutionary and molecular genetics in the management of wild fisheries

“…) and quantifying the extent of interbreeding in mixed populations using genetic monitoring (Denson et al . ). In Australia, there have been limited trials of marine restocking with species such as finfish (Butcher et al .…”

Parentage‐Based Tagging: Reviewing the Implementation of a New Tool for an Old Problem

“…Parentage assignment is a common genetic tool used in fisheries for examining dispersal (e.g., Planes et al 2009), supplementation (e.g., Denson et al 2012), and introgression (e.g., Muhlfeld et al 2009), but the idea of implementing a parentage-based approach as a large-scale tagging methodology at salmonid hatcheries was only recently envisioned (Anderson and Garza 2006). Parentage assignment is a common genetic tool used in fisheries for examining dispersal (e.g., Planes et al 2009), supplementation (e.g., Denson et al 2012), and introgression (e.g., Muhlfeld et al 2009), but the idea of implementing a parentage-based approach as a large-scale tagging methodology at salmonid hatcheries was only recently envisioned (Anderson and Garza 2006).…”

Population and individual identification of coho salmon in British Columbia through parentage-based tagging and genetic stock identification: an alternative to coded-wire tags

“…When all parental brood stocks are genotyped, then every offspring is genetically "tagged", which is equivalent to a 100% CWT rate, substantially higher than the current approximately 10% CWT tagging rates of juvenile coho salmon released from hatcheries in British Columbia. PBT has been employed in a number of applications in both natural and hatchery settings (Denson et al 2012; Abadia-Cardosa et al 2013; Ford et al 2015) and has provided valuable information on individual reproductive success and effective population size.…”