Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.outlook.2009.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing quality and safety competencies of graduating prelicensure nursing students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
100
0
6

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
7
100
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the pre-and post-averages of participants on the QSEN questionnaire that measures their core competency of nursing knowledge, skills, and attitudes of patient-centered care, safety, team work, evidence based practice, quality improvement, and informatics are compared using t-tests: In all cases, the post-sums show significantly higher levels than the pre-sums, indicating that the study participants have perceived themselves more competent carrying out nursing skills after the program. This outcome coincides with the study conducted by Sullivan, Hirst, and Cronenwett [37] in that their study sample relatively have perceived high levels of preparedness in the nursing program that implemented the QSEN framework, implying skills' improvements; and participants have endorsed the importance of quality and safety competencies to professional practice after the program. Although literature provides the substantial numbers of recommendations for educators to use the QSEN framework in their nursing curriculum, there is a scarcity of literature that report research outcomes on investigating the effectiveness of core QSEN competency skills in students and their comprehensive applications to novice nurses.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…For example, the pre-and post-averages of participants on the QSEN questionnaire that measures their core competency of nursing knowledge, skills, and attitudes of patient-centered care, safety, team work, evidence based practice, quality improvement, and informatics are compared using t-tests: In all cases, the post-sums show significantly higher levels than the pre-sums, indicating that the study participants have perceived themselves more competent carrying out nursing skills after the program. This outcome coincides with the study conducted by Sullivan, Hirst, and Cronenwett [37] in that their study sample relatively have perceived high levels of preparedness in the nursing program that implemented the QSEN framework, implying skills' improvements; and participants have endorsed the importance of quality and safety competencies to professional practice after the program. Although literature provides the substantial numbers of recommendations for educators to use the QSEN framework in their nursing curriculum, there is a scarcity of literature that report research outcomes on investigating the effectiveness of core QSEN competency skills in students and their comprehensive applications to novice nurses.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In addition, the OSCE includes awareness of the culture and the complexity of the healthcare system, as well as teamwork and the relevance of learning from skills [19,21]. Similar to the patient safety framework of the WHO, the Quality and Safety Education for Nurses (QSEN) includes six quality and patient safety domains, more specifically patient-centred care, evidence based practice, quality improvement, informatics, patient safety, teamwork and collaboration [1,2,10,[22][23][24][25][26]. These domains were explicitly established to create inter-professional education [23].…”
Section: Health Professional Education In Patient Safety Survey (H-pementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of participants from the associate degree programs was small with the research results reported jointly among both program types (Chenot & Daniel, 2010;Smith, Cronenwett, & Sherwood, 2007). Safety research has focused on student perspectives of safety knowledge taught in curricula (Sullivan, Hirst, & Cronenwett, 2009). …”
Section: Literature Gapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guidelines on achieving consensus are subjective and must be determined prior to beginning the study (Hasson, Keeney, & McKenna, 2000). designed to test teaching strategies and generate ideas to explore collaboration learning strategies (Cronenwett et al, 2009). A suggestion for additional research is to organize state-wide faculty focus groups to define the appropriate level of quality and safety complexity expected for first semester students, first-year students and second-year students.…”
Section: Recommendations For Further Studymentioning
confidence: 99%