2017
DOI: 10.5455/jnbs.1485955027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing Proprioception

Abstract: ÖzetPropriyoseption, vücudun parçalarının göreceli konumunun ve hareket sırasında işe yönelik harcanan efor direncinin hissi anlamına gelmektedir. İyi bir sensorimotor kontrol için propriyosepsiyon gereklidir. İnme, Parkinson hastalığı, periferik duyu nöropatileri gibi ya da ligamentler, eklem kapsülleri ve kaslarda yaralanmalar gibi çeşitli nörolojik ve ortopedik koşullardan sonra propriyoseptif bozulmaların yaygın olduğu bilinse de, klinik pratikte propriyoseptif fonksiyonların ölçümünde objektif, doğru ve g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The subject is asked to alternately touch their nose and the examiner's finger as fast as possible [3].…”
Section: Finger-nose-fingermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The subject is asked to alternately touch their nose and the examiner's finger as fast as possible [3].…”
Section: Finger-nose-fingermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clinician asks the patient to first stand quietly with eyes open, and ultimately with eyes closed. The Romberg test is scored by counting the seconds the person is able to stand with eyes closed [3].…”
Section: Distal Proprioception Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, research of proprioception impairments is limited, and it is difficult to characterise the extent of these impairments due to the large variability among stroke survivors: they vary in age, gender, modalities, the severity of damage and other factors (Connell, Lincoln and Radford, 2008). An important limiting factor in the research of proprioceptive impairments is the lack of objective and quantitative tools (Hillier, Immink and Thewlis, 2015), (Sayar and nübol, 2017). This is partially due to the perception among therapists that motor based assessments provide sufficient information about somatosensory function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distal proprioception test is applied to the big toe, where the examiner grasps it and performs vertical movements (up and down) while the participant observes it, and then is asked to repeat the movement with closed eyes (Sayar and nübol, 2017). These types of evaluation raise the question of objectivity and quantification, since the severity of the impairment may be interpreted differently by different physical therapists because it is harder to quantify it by simply observing it (Hillier, Immink and Thewlis, 2015), (Sayar and nübol, 2017), (Han et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%