2009
DOI: 10.21236/ada494988
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing Professional Competence by Using Occupational Judgment Tests Derived From Job Analysis Questionnaires

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results from the last phase of this study showing significant correlation between the CSQ and Inventory SJT scores and the MOE supervisor ratings, supplemented by the regression analysis, and are consistent with previous research that found SJTs to be Police Practice and Research: An International Journal 9 predictive of performance (Hedlund et al, 2006;Legree et al, 2009). These results suggest that problem-solving ability (as measured by the SJTs) plays a role in police officer competency and effectiveness.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Results from the last phase of this study showing significant correlation between the CSQ and Inventory SJT scores and the MOE supervisor ratings, supplemented by the regression analysis, and are consistent with previous research that found SJTs to be Police Practice and Research: An International Journal 9 predictive of performance (Hedlund et al, 2006;Legree et al, 2009). These results suggest that problem-solving ability (as measured by the SJTs) plays a role in police officer competency and effectiveness.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Cronbach's alpha reliabilities (better, r = .92, n = 48, p < .05; worse, r = .76, n = 48, p < .05) were acceptable. While the 'n' is small, previous research has shown that scoring rubrics can be reliably computed from a smaller number of experts (Legree, Psotka, Bludeau, & Gray, 2009). Figure 1 shows a sample scenario.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first purpose would be to cluster MOS in order to select which to target in criterion-related validation research. The second purpose would be to identify or develop end-of-training criteria that sufficiently support the Army's personnel classification research but require fewer resources to construct and administer [e.g., the occupational judgment tests developed by Legree, Psotka, Bludau, and Gray (2009)]. In the long-term, collecting job analytic ratings on a large sample of MOS would allow the Army to evaluate procedures for generalizing or transporting criterion-related validation evidence obtained from a smaller sample of MOS to a larger one.…”
Section: Collect Data On a Larger Sample Of Mos And Use To Cluster Mosmentioning
confidence: 99%