2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.07.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing productivity and carbon sequestration capacity of Eucalyptus globulus plantations using the process model Forest-DNDC: Calibration and validation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
58
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, further comparisons are hampered by the scarce number of studies that quantified the carbon content in a laboratory. Most of the studies that aim to estimate the carbon stock in plantations (MIEHLE et al, 2006;RAZAKAMANARIVO et al, 2011;ZHANG et al, 2012) use a generic value of 50% to estimate the carbon content in biomass.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, further comparisons are hampered by the scarce number of studies that quantified the carbon content in a laboratory. Most of the studies that aim to estimate the carbon stock in plantations (MIEHLE et al, 2006;RAZAKAMANARIVO et al, 2011;ZHANG et al, 2012) use a generic value of 50% to estimate the carbon content in biomass.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Update for forested wetlands , Cui et al 2005 Tropical forests . Model evaluation (Kesik et al 2005, Miehle et al 2006) , Smith et al 1997, Peng et al 1998 Uncertainty or sensitivity analysis (Liski et al 2005, Peltoniemi et al 2006, Monni et al 2007 Komarov and Chertov 2007) (Eckersten et al 2001) In unpublished reports -available from P. Smith Most sensitive factor method or Monte Carlo approach (Li et al 2004), applications (Kesik et al 2005 None have been published…”
Section: Comparability Of Simulations and Empirical Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The correlations between the measured and modeled monthly mean NEE fluxes were expressed with the R-squared values as 0.91, 0.73, 0.73 and 0.57 for Tharandt, Griffin-Aberfeldy, upland Grainesville and wetland Grainesville, respectively. Except the above-described four cases tested in this study, more validation tests have been conducted for Forest-DNDC by a number of researchers worldwide (e.g., Miehle et al, 2006;Sun et al, 2006;Kesik et al, 2005;Kiese et al, 2004;Butterbach-Bahl et al, 2004;Zhang et al, 2002;Stange et al, 2000). The validation results suggested that Forest-DNDC was applicable for C balance studies across a wide range of forest ecosystems.…”
Section: Validations Of Forest-dndcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Driven by climate, forest type, soil properties, management practices and other relevant input parameters, the models can simulate forest production as well as C and N cycles in the ecosystems. Among the modeling efforts, the Forest-DNDC model developed by Li and his colleagues has been widely tested for greenhouse gas studies Kiese et al, 2004;Cui et al, 2005;Kesik et al, 2005;Miehle et al, 2006). In this study, we applied Forest-DNDC for understanding the NEE fluxes observed at two adjacent forest ecosystems located at the southern boundary of European taiga in Russia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%