1998
DOI: 10.1080/0950069980200706
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing pre‐university students through extended individual investigations: teachers’ and examiners’ views

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…37 Items were rated on a 6-point scale (0, no individuals; 5, 9 or more individuals). We computed a total score (range 0 – 15) where a higher score indicated more social integration.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…37 Items were rated on a 6-point scale (0, no individuals; 5, 9 or more individuals). We computed a total score (range 0 – 15) where a higher score indicated more social integration.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Lubben Social Network Index measured social integration experience by the caregiver through the number of individuals the caregiver interacts with monthly, talks with comfortably, and asks assistance from easily. 30 The three items were rated on a six-point scale ranging from zero (no individuals) to five (nine or more individuals), and we calculated a total score (range 0-15). Higher scores indicated more social integration.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pedagogical problems complied by Costenson & Lawson (1986) include: inquiry labs require too much energy to teach, inquiry is risky because the administration may not understand what is going on and think that the teacher is doing a poor job, and inquiry textbooks lock a teacher into a particular teaching sequence and the teacher cannot skip labs because there is too much new material in each lab. In England, Lubben & Ramsden (1998) interviewed 18 chemistry teachers who indicated that they had most problems in guiding students to select a research topic and reformulate it into an investigation. Generally, teachers do not know how to withhold answers from students to maintain an atmosphere that encourages inquiry (Furtak, 2006).…”
Section: Pedagogical Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%