2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2011.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing post-fire vegetation recovery using red–near infrared vegetation indices: Accounting for background and vegetation variability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
1
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous studies, a variety of spectral indices (such as DI by Healey et al 2005, NDVI and EVI by Stroppiana et al 2012 and NDVI, DVI, RVI, SAVI, etc. by Veraverbeke et al 2012) have been utilized and compared, and are being proven to achieve high accuracies. However, discussion on the causes of the variations in accuracies under certain circumstances still remains to be further explored.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous studies, a variety of spectral indices (such as DI by Healey et al 2005, NDVI and EVI by Stroppiana et al 2012 and NDVI, DVI, RVI, SAVI, etc. by Veraverbeke et al 2012) have been utilized and compared, and are being proven to achieve high accuracies. However, discussion on the causes of the variations in accuracies under certain circumstances still remains to be further explored.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Figure 5e shows that there was a sharp decrease when the fire occurred in May 1987. Following the fire event, there was a rapid increase from June to August (Figure 5f-h), which was likely the NDVI response of the understory vegetation (e.g., herbaceous and shrubs) to temperature or precipitation variability [34,35]. From September to November, the Great Xing'an Mountain entered autumn; NDVI values decreased in both years with the spread of colored foliage and the percentage of fallen leaves increasing.…”
Section: Fire Damage Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Applications of remote sensing aimed at monitoring structural attributes of forests that were listed above have been driven largely by using empirical models to calibrate remotely sensed data with in situ data in either boreal or other forest ecosystems (Table 7, [8,28,112,187,196,[202][203][204][205][206][207][208][209][210][211][212][213]). For example, regression-based prediction has been a widely accepted approach to mapping regional forest attributes using linear regression [196,203,204,213], nonlinear regression [187,[209][210][211]214,215], partial least squares regression [216] and regression tree algorithms [26,217].…”
Section: Measurement Of Other Variables In Forest Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, regression-based prediction has been a widely accepted approach to mapping regional forest attributes using linear regression [196,203,204,213], nonlinear regression [187,[209][210][211]214,215], partial least squares regression [216] and regression tree algorithms [26,217]. Recently, non-parametric regression approaches, such as Reduced Major Axis (RMA) regression, k-Nearest Neighbor (k-NN), Gradient Nearest Neighbor (GNN) and Random Forest (RF) regressions, have received considerable attention for the estimation of structural forest attributes, because these approaches can account for mapping uncertainty and involve a large number of response variables with analytical and operational flexibility [28,209,218].…”
Section: Measurement Of Other Variables In Forest Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation