Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2019
DOI: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000362
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing Positive Orientation With the Implicit Association Test

Abstract: Abstract. Positive orientation (PO) is a basic predisposition that consists in a positive outlook toward oneself, one’s life, and one’s future, which is associated to many desirable outcomes connected to health and to the general quality of life. We performed a lexical study for identifying a set of markers of PO, developed an Implicit Association Test (the PO-IAT), and investigated its psychometric properties. The PO-IAT proved to be a reliable measure with a clear pattern of convergent validity, both with re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(66 reference statements)
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An implicit measure of positivity recently also has been developed using the implicit association test (IAT), by Costantini et al. (); called the PO‐IAT . This newer and implicit measure has shown internal consistency and clear convergent validity with the P Scale, and accounted for a unique proportion of variance in the frequency of depressive symptoms, self‐esteem, optimism, and life satisfaction, assessed with the traditional questionnaire‐based measures.…”
Section: Psychometric Properties Of the P Scale Across Languages And mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An implicit measure of positivity recently also has been developed using the implicit association test (IAT), by Costantini et al. (); called the PO‐IAT . This newer and implicit measure has shown internal consistency and clear convergent validity with the P Scale, and accounted for a unique proportion of variance in the frequency of depressive symptoms, self‐esteem, optimism, and life satisfaction, assessed with the traditional questionnaire‐based measures.…”
Section: Psychometric Properties Of the P Scale Across Languages And mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Costantini et al. () also developed a brief instrument to assess positive orientation using adjectives, the Positive Orientation Adjective Scale (POAS). Whereas the POAS showed an encouraging level of convergence with the P‐Scale and the PO‐IAT (as well as with measures of depressive symptoms, self‐esteem, optimism, and life satisfaction), its psychometric properties need to be further analyzed in future studies.…”
Section: Psychometric Properties Of the P Scale Across Languages And mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to our knowledge, no study examined whether the subjective importance of goals related to a trait would predict the desire to change that trait. We hypothesized (Hypothesis 2.2) that subjective importance of conscientious goals would predict the desire to increase conscientiousness, above and beyond variance explained by the current personality and by positive orientation, a construct that encompasses life satisfaction, self‐esteem, and optimism (Alessandri, Caprara, & Tisak, 2012; Caprara et al, 2012; Costantini et al, 2016).…”
Section: Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, the P Scale has been found to have robust psychometric properties as indicated by its good reliability coefficients (e.g., Caprara et al, 2012), its measurement invariance across gender and countries (e.g., Caprara et al, 2012; Heikamp et al, 2014), and its expected associations with theoretically relevant constructs such as positive and negative affect, depression, and personality traits (e.g., Caprara et al, 2012; Borsa et al, 2015; Tian et al, 2018). Recent findings also attested to the convergent validity of the P Scale with implicit measures of positivity (using the implicit association test), self-perceived intelligence (Costantini et al, 2019), and dispositional flow (Riva et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%