Assessing pollinators’ use of floral resource subsidies in agri-environment schemes: An illustration usingPhacelia tanacetifoliaand honeybees

Abstract

BackgroundHoneybees (Apis mellifera L.) are frequently used in agriculture for pollination services because of their abundance, generalist floral preferences, ease of management and hive transport. However, their populations are declining in many countries. Agri-Environment Schemes (AES) are being implemented in agricultural systems to combat the decline in populations of pollinators and other insects. Despite AES being increasingly embedded in policy and budgets, scientific assessments of many of these schemes still are lacking, and only a few studies have examined the extent to which insect pollinators use the floral enhancements that are part of AES and on which floral components they feed (i.e., pollen and/or nectar).MethodsIn the present work, we used a combination of observations on honeybee foraging for nectar/pollen from the Californian annual plant Phacelia tanacetifolia in the field, collection of pollen pellets from hives, and pollen identification, to assess the value of adding phacelia to an agro-ecosystem to benefit honeybees.ResultsIt was found that phacelia pollen was almost never taken by honeybees. The work here demonstrates that honeybees may not use the floral enhancements added to a landscape as expected and points to the need for more careful assessments of what resources are used by honeybees in AES and understanding the role, if any, which AES play in enhancing pollinator fitness.DiscussionWe recommend using the methodology in this paper to explore the efficacy of AES before particular flowering species are adopted more widely to give a more complete illustration of the actual efficacy of AES.

Assessment of the growth in social groups for sustainable agriculture and land management

“…MIRGs use pasture redesign centred on short-duration grazing episodes on small paddocks or temporarily fenced areas, with longer rest periods that allow grassland plants to regrow before grazing returns (NRC, 2010). Well-managed grazing systems have been associated with greater temporal and spatial diversity of plant species, increased carbon sequestration, reduced soil erosion, improved wildlife habitat and decreased input use (Sprague et al , 2016).…”

Weed Composition in Hungarian Phacelia (Phacelia tanacetifolia Benth.) Seed Production: Could Tine Harrow Take over Chemical Management?

“…It is among the world's top twenty melliferous plants, providing monofloral honey with excellent quality for human consumption [2][3][4]. It also supports wild pollinators and some biological control agents with pollen and nectar [5][6][7][8][9]. As a cover crop and green manure, it is beneficial for soil structure [10] and soil microorganisms [11]; nevertheless, its effect for weed infestation has been assessed with different outcomes.…”

Agroecology of a salad crop pest in New Zealand

“…Although they can lead to many benefits beyond those originally intended, these are rarely quantified. For example, phacelia can enhance biological control but is also greatly favoured by bees (Sprague et al, 2016). Furthermore, endemic New Zealand flowering plants in vineyards ( Figure 5) can enhance multiple ES such as weed suppression, mineralization of plant material and soil water retention while leading to increased natural enemy abundance and efficacy .…”

“…Shelter, nectar, alternative food and pollen (SNAP) is a concept that summarises many of the benefits that flowering plants can provide to an ecosystem (Gurr et al, 2017). Many other practices, such as ecological enhancement schemes which include pollination have flowering plants integrated into them because of these benefits (Wratten et al, 2012;Sprague et al, 2016). When SNAP is provided in an ecosystem, it provides a reservoir of resources that can be drawn upon by the organisms to improve their 'fitness' (Nilsson et al, 2016).…”