2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.watbs.2022.100132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing physical habitat structure and biological condition in eastern Amazonia stream sites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The adapted BMWP shows a better response to the pollution than the adapted ASPT 40 . da Silva-Santos et al 42 also reported that BMWP was more able than ASPT to detect differences in habitat quality. Moreover, Deemool and Prommi 43 found that the adapted BMWP and ASPT responded to different water quality factors, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The adapted BMWP shows a better response to the pollution than the adapted ASPT 40 . da Silva-Santos et al 42 also reported that BMWP was more able than ASPT to detect differences in habitat quality. Moreover, Deemool and Prommi 43 found that the adapted BMWP and ASPT responded to different water quality factors, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The input of organic matter (OM) from bare soil causes a decrease in the bioavailability of DO. (BRAGA et al, 2018;SÁ et al, 2019;MOY et al, 2022;SANTOS et al, 2022) selected for analysis the physicochemical parameters that identify the water quality of bioindicators. The core of the question in these researches, was directed to the quantitative of the species classified as tolerant, sensitive, or intolerant and, there is also a direction to the impact factor as mining (SILVA, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%