2005
DOI: 10.1207/s15327574ijt0503_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing Personality and Mood With Adjective Check List Methodology: A Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Participants indicated how they felt after the comparison by checking any relevant feelings that applied from a list of 32 emotions taken from Watson, Clark, and Tellegen (1988) and Iyer, Leach, and Crosby (2003). Because we wanted participants to review a large set of emotion terms quickly and efficiently, we opted for a simple checklist format as opposed to rating each term on individual Likert-type scales (Craig, 2005). We created four categories of emotion words to represent envy (envy, inferior, discouraged, insecure, resentment), anxiety (anxious, worried, fearful, guilty), pride (proud, confident, superior, pleased, satisfied), and inspiration (admiration, inspired, hopeful, encouraged, optimistic).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants indicated how they felt after the comparison by checking any relevant feelings that applied from a list of 32 emotions taken from Watson, Clark, and Tellegen (1988) and Iyer, Leach, and Crosby (2003). Because we wanted participants to review a large set of emotion terms quickly and efficiently, we opted for a simple checklist format as opposed to rating each term on individual Likert-type scales (Craig, 2005). We created four categories of emotion words to represent envy (envy, inferior, discouraged, insecure, resentment), anxiety (anxious, worried, fearful, guilty), pride (proud, confident, superior, pleased, satisfied), and inspiration (admiration, inspired, hopeful, encouraged, optimistic).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…În acest sens, parcurgerea literaturii recente, arată că o bază de date care poate să reprezinte un input valoros este reprezentată de studiile din domeniul psihologiei educaţionale. Studiile anterioare publicate în reviste cu orientare educaţională au reliefat impactul profilului profesorului asupra performanţelor academice ale elevilor (Murray, Rushton şi Paunonen, 1990;Furnham şi Premuzic, 2005;Malikov, 2005Malikov, -2006; Arnon şi Reichel, 2007), în ciuda definiţiilor multiple ale personalităţii (aspiraţii, stil cognitiv, dispoziţii, obiective, instincte, interese, motive, nevoi, planuri, năzuinţe, sentimente, trăsături, tipuri, valori ale unei persoane, etc., aşa cum le prezintă Craig, 2005) sau multiplelor moduri de evaluare a acesteia, încă neclare.…”
Section: Fundamentarea Teoreticăunclassified