Assessing Pathways to Success: Need for Reform and Governance Capacities in Asia

Goebel, Christian; Maslow, Sebastian

doi:10.2139/ssrn.2287538

Cited by 1 publication

(3 citation statements)

References 54 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…They have also continued being resilient, albeit at a slow pace, in coping with the effects of the 2008 global financial crisis. The two countries are characterized as middle-income economies in the Southeast Asian region, which are comparable in political and economic stances (Göbel & Maslow, 2013;Shair-Rosenfield et al, 2014). The working mechanism of national innovation systems deals with these empirical situations.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Indonesia has been behind Malaysia in applying its national innovation system (Degelsegger et al, 2014;Göbel & Maslow, 2013).…”

Section: Indonesiamentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Southeast Asian countries are diverse in many ways which prevents them from being generalized as a similar or simplified model of polity and governance (Hill, 2014). Croissant as better in managing macroeconomic policy than the democratic, less-interventionist, and decentralized-unitary Indonesia (Göbel & Maslow, 2013;Shair-Rosenfield, Marks, & Hooghe, 2014).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Persistent Developmental Limits to Devising Policy Innovation for Innovation Policies in Emerging Economies

Holidin

2022

pgr

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Promising industrial profiles of Southeast Asian emerging economies have met their developmental limits in the face of the Asian Financial Crisis in the late 1990s. However, following the crisis, they have not been successful in upscaling the technological competitiveness of their industries. By applying the national innovation system approach originally developed in advanced western economies as an institutional mechanism of policy innovation in light of developmentalism, I seek to explain these persistent developmental limits in Malaysia and Indonesia. My qualitative research examines literature discussing policy coordination mechanisms in innovation policies and policy documents containing coordination mechanisms involving firms, universities, and government agencies; then, how these issues implicate innovation policies in the two countries. I employ a comparative institutional analysis between them focusing on institutional characteristics of the national innovation systems, specifically their institutional obstacles occurring within development paths amidst prevailing political environments. I suggest that persistent developmental limits in Malaysia and Indonesia result from systemic failures of achieving developmental aims regardless of their politico-administrative regimes. Existing institutional frameworks of the national innovation systems, entrenched in the socio-economic prevalence of the two countries, have not fit the nations’ developmental aims pursued upon innovation upgrading.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Indonesia has been behind Malaysia in applying its national innovation system (Degelsegger et al, 2014;Göbel & Maslow, 2013).…”

Section: Indonesiamentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Persistent Developmental Limits to Devising Policy Innovation for Innovation Policies in Emerging Economies

Holidin

2022

pgr

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Assessing Pathways to Success: Need for Reform and Governance Capacities in Asia

Cited by 1 publication

References 54 publications

Persistent Developmental Limits to Devising Policy Innovation for Innovation Policies in Emerging Economies

Persistent Developmental Limits to Devising Policy Innovation for Innovation Policies in Emerging Economies

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About