2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2009.01.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing palatability of long-chain fatty acids from the licking behavior of BALB/c mice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
4
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4C). This observation is consistent with previous results showing that mice exhibit high licking rates to corn oil and longchain unsaturated fatty acids, including 18:1 FA and 18:2 FA, but low responses to saturated fatty acids (37). Collectively, the available data suggest that endocannabinoid signaling in the small intestine contributes to the preference that rats display for fatty foods rich in unsaturated fatty acids (i.e., 18:2 FA and 18:1 FA), but not saturated or polyunsaturated fatty acids (i.e., 18:0 FA or 18:3 FA, respectively).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…4C). This observation is consistent with previous results showing that mice exhibit high licking rates to corn oil and longchain unsaturated fatty acids, including 18:1 FA and 18:2 FA, but low responses to saturated fatty acids (37). Collectively, the available data suggest that endocannabinoid signaling in the small intestine contributes to the preference that rats display for fatty foods rich in unsaturated fatty acids (i.e., 18:2 FA and 18:1 FA), but not saturated or polyunsaturated fatty acids (i.e., 18:0 FA or 18:3 FA, respectively).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In our experiments, this phenomenon occurred while the LCFA concentration used (i.e., 200 ”M ≈ 0.005%) was undetectable by the mouse when it was presented alone during licking tests. It is consistent with the results of Yoneda et al (25) showing that mice are unable to properly detect 0.01% LCFA (ALA, OLA, or linoleic acid) during short-term behavioral tests. Therefore, the change in perceived intensity of sweet taste may not be attributed to addition of sucrose and LCFA effects.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…When the licking behavior of the mice was tested, it was found that the mice exhibited equally strong preference for a low concentration of linoleic acid as that for 100% corn oil (29). In addition, the mice exhibited a similar strong preference for LCFAs, such as oleic, linolenic, and linoleic acid, whereas they did not display any preference for LCFA esters nor long-chain fatty alcohols (28). Moreover, ingesting linoleic acid at a low concentration increased extracellular DA release in the NAc of rats (1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%