2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00134-009-1590-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing pain in non-intubated critically ill patients unable to self report: an adaptation of the Behavioral Pain Scale

Abstract: Pain during procedures is perceived even in non-intubated ICU patients with delirium. In those patients, pain level can be assessed with the BPS-NI scale since this instrument exhibited good psychometric properties. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00134-009-1590-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
115
0
23

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(146 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
8
115
0
23
Order By: Relevance
“…Pain was evaluated systematically in all patients who were not deeply sedated (Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale [RASS] S -4). Self-reporting is the most reliable indicator of pain, so numeric rating scales-oral or visual (NRS-0 or NRS-V) were used whenever possible (lO).The behavioral pain scale (BPS) was substituted for intubated patients and its adaptation for the nonintubated patients (BPS nonintubated [BPS-NI]) who were aphasie or otherwise unable to communicate (11,12). The BPS ranges from 3 (no pain behavior) to 12 (maximal possible pain behavior) and was chosen as it avoided using vital signs or other physiological variables that had been previously shown to be less specific in the critically ill ( 13).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pain was evaluated systematically in all patients who were not deeply sedated (Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale [RASS] S -4). Self-reporting is the most reliable indicator of pain, so numeric rating scales-oral or visual (NRS-0 or NRS-V) were used whenever possible (lO).The behavioral pain scale (BPS) was substituted for intubated patients and its adaptation for the nonintubated patients (BPS nonintubated [BPS-NI]) who were aphasie or otherwise unable to communicate (11,12). The BPS ranges from 3 (no pain behavior) to 12 (maximal possible pain behavior) and was chosen as it avoided using vital signs or other physiological variables that had been previously shown to be less specific in the critically ill ( 13).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29 The BPS item "compliance with ventilator" was replaced by "vocalization" in the BPS-NI, which was inspired from the PBAT. 30 The BPS-NI was tested in 30 ICU adult patients with a medical or surgical diagnosis, for a total of 120 paired evaluations.…”
Section: Behavioral Pain Scale-nonintubatedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the BPS, Chanques et al [61] developed and validated a modified version of the BPS for non-intubated patients (BPS-NI) with inability to self-report due to delirium in order to improve the measurement of pain. The third domain of the BPS (i.e.…”
Section: Monitoring Of Pain and Sedationmentioning
confidence: 99%