2016
DOI: 10.1097/pas.0000000000000666
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing p16 Status of Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma by Combined Assessment of the Number of Cells Stained and the Confluence of p16 Staining

Abstract: Human papilloma virus (HPV) related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) has favorable prognosis relative to other head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Criteria for predicting HPV status based upon p16 staining, including difficult cases with partial staining patterns, have been developed; however, clinical validation of these criteria and the clinical significance of partial p16 staining have not been reported. 81 archival OPSCC cases were initially stained for p16 by immunohistochemistry with clo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(26 reference statements)
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, establishing an accurate and reliable method of HPV detection in cytologic samples is critical [31]. Table 2 summarizes the many of the studies conducted in recent years comparing commercially available tests for their performance in HNSCC specimens [28,[32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44].…”
Section: Hpv Detection Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, establishing an accurate and reliable method of HPV detection in cytologic samples is critical [31]. Table 2 summarizes the many of the studies conducted in recent years comparing commercially available tests for their performance in HNSCC specimens [28,[32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44].…”
Section: Hpv Detection Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, oropharyngeal cancer patients with HPV+ status have been found to represent a subgroup with markedly better prognosis and improved response to conventional radiotherapy . Typically, HPV status testing is performed using immunohistochemistry staining to determine the expression of presence of p16, a protein‐based biomarker for the detection of viral deoxyribonucleic acid . The application of quantitative image analysis methods, such as radiomics, with reliable power in detection of the HPV status may serve as attractive alternative approaches toward determining the HPV status …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6] Typically, HPV status testing is performed using immunohistochemistry staining to determine the expression of presence of p16, a proteinbased biomarker for the detection of viral deoxyribonucleic acid. [7][8][9][10] The application of quantitative image analysis methods, such as radiomics, with reliable power in detection of the HPV status may serve as attractive alternative approaches toward determining the HPV status. [11][12][13][14] Computed tomography (CT) imaging plays a central role in early detection and prognosis for different types of cancers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,6 This partial staining is a realistic problem occasionally encountered in clinical practice. [12][13][14] As p16 testing is becoming a recommended standard for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma, more technical and method-based studies are needed to identify the best and most reproducible test for use in clinical practice, and as groundwork for anticipated laboratory proficiency testing. There are a number of commercially available immunohistochemical assays (antibody clones) for p16, and, although they largely have performed well at prognostication and patient risk stratification in large studies, there are some suggestions of variable performance characteristics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a number of commercially available immunohistochemical assays (antibody clones) for p16, and, although they largely have performed well at prognostication and patient risk stratification in large studies, there are some suggestions of variable performance characteristics. 12,14 As there is, to our knowledge, no study directly comparing performance of different p16 antibodies in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma, and because patient outcomes are the standard by which they should be evaluated, we performed a comparative study of three different commercially available p16 antibodies in a large tissue microarray cohort of patients with robust clinical follow-up information.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%