2020
DOI: 10.1080/0142159x.2020.1811214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing open-book examination in medical education: The time is now

Abstract: As a result of the coronavirus pandemic, the feasibility of holding secure closed-book examinations in medical education is compromised. In this Personal View, we compare the underlying reasoning for using open-book and closed-book exams. We rethink the role of open-book assessment and offer ways in which we believe they can complement closed-book exams. We highlight the gap in research, highlight future directions, and call on medical educators to seize our current golden opportunity to explore the impact of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
53
0
5

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(15 reference statements)
1
53
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…43 With universities and educators having to adapt to the new reality of this pandemic, a debate between open book examinations (OBEs) and closed book examinations (CBEs) has arisen. 44 Due to the incapacity for organising examinations in person, OBE has been suggested as an alternative tool of rigorous assessments in medical schools. 45 For example, at Imperial College London, the online assessment consists of an OBE of 150 questions.…”
Section: Examinationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…43 With universities and educators having to adapt to the new reality of this pandemic, a debate between open book examinations (OBEs) and closed book examinations (CBEs) has arisen. 44 Due to the incapacity for organising examinations in person, OBE has been suggested as an alternative tool of rigorous assessments in medical schools. 45 For example, at Imperial College London, the online assessment consists of an OBE of 150 questions.…”
Section: Examinationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…47 OBEs as an assessment for deep learning are more authentic to clinical practice and real-life expectations, reinforcing at the same time evidence-based medicine. 44 Integration of knowledge from multiple sources and the use of internet, as an invaluable learning tool for medical students, could help medical students to be more self-directed learners, while OBEs may foster deeper processing more effectively and strengthen their long-term memory. This type of assessment also reduces the anxiety surrounding the examination in medical students, who feel less pressured when sitting on a familiar and comfortable location, such as their room in their own home.…”
Section: Examinationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All over the world, universities and higher educational institutions have been closed, fully or partially, to limit the expansion of COVID-19 infection. Online examination had become common and popular for many years, but the emergence of the new coronavirus disease (COVID-19) noti ed its importance and consequently has forced us to use it more than before (9). Although, many educational institutes were approved E-exams, but these processes were usually based on in-campus online exams in which students receive technical support to make the exam environment more suitable; unfortunately, these supports are not completely possible in remote testing now.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We feel teaching methods should be altered to help prepare students to navigate and appraise credible online resources, promote deeper clinical discussions and involve sufficient practice assessments. 2 For pathology examinations, questions should focus on the application of knowledge, thereby reducing the reliance on such as CPQs (clinical prioritisation questions) could also be introduced. CPQs involve students ranking options, as opposed to selecting one correct answer; they require higher thinking skills and accustom students to clinical uncertainty.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%