1994
DOI: 10.1016/0306-4603(94)90032-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing nicotine dependence: A comparison of the fagerström tolerance questionnaire (FTQ) with the fagerström test for nicotine dependence (FTND) in a clinical sample

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
156
2
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 246 publications
(168 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
9
156
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the correlation analysis, urinary cotinine levels were associated with both the number of cigarettes smoked per day and the FTND scores, which was consistent with previous studies (Heatherton et al, 1991;Payne et al, 1994;Law et al, 1997;Caraballo et al, 1998;Park et al, 2004;Blackford et al, 2006). In contrast to previous reports that showed that the duration of smoking was not associated with the FTND scores (John et al, 2003;Park et al, 2004), the degree of nicotine dependence increased according to the total smoking period in our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the correlation analysis, urinary cotinine levels were associated with both the number of cigarettes smoked per day and the FTND scores, which was consistent with previous studies (Heatherton et al, 1991;Payne et al, 1994;Law et al, 1997;Caraballo et al, 1998;Park et al, 2004;Blackford et al, 2006). In contrast to previous reports that showed that the duration of smoking was not associated with the FTND scores (John et al, 2003;Park et al, 2004), the degree of nicotine dependence increased according to the total smoking period in our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Other reports showed a dose-dependent relationship between cotinine levels and the number of cigarettes smoked per day, another measure of the FTND (Law et al, 1997;Blackford et al, 2006;Fu et al, 2012). Moreover, several previous reports showed a significant relationship between the degree of nicotine dependence (as assessed by the total FTND score) and cotinine levels (Heatherton et al, 1991;Payne et al, 1994;Pomerleau et al, 1994). However, as those studies primarily focused on a simple linear correlation, there is a lack of data showing how cotinine levels independently predict severity of nicotine dependence after adjustment of potential confounding factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The key findings of the study were as follows: two factors were found to fit the data and the internal reliability of the scale was low alongside its underlying subscales. The study lends further support to the bi-dimensionality of the scale as reported in other cultural settings (Payne et al, 1994;Etter & Perneger, 1999;Haddock et al, 1999;Radzius et al, 2003). This study confirmed as well that Factor 1 reflects the degree of urgency to restore nicotine levels to a given threshold after waking whilst Factor 2 reflects the persistence with which nicotine concentration are maintained during waking hours (Radzius et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…and "Do you find it hard to refrain from smoking in places where it is forbidden?" The FTND has shown good internal consistency, positive relations with key smoking variables (e.g., saliva cotinine; Heatherton, Kozlowski, Frecker, & Fagerstrom, 1991;Payne, Smith, McCracken, McSherry, & Antony, 1994), and high degrees of test-retest reliability (Pomerleau, Carton, Lutzke, Flessland, & Pomerleau, 1994). Babor, de la Fuente, Saunders, & Grant, 1992).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%