2020
DOI: 10.4236/as.2020.1111066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing New Banana Genotypes for Relevant Traits: Implication for Variety Selection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, most hybrids were characterized as being excessively hard by touch and firm in the mouth, which are attributes not preferred by consumers, as reported by other authors. 8,21 During the assessment of relevant traits for selection of new cooking banana genotypes, Tumuhimbise et al 22 emphasized the possession of acceptable sensory attributes alongside yield and resistance to diseases as a critical requisite, suggesting that new cultivars with a high yellow intensity, a uniformly distributed yellow color, and a good matooke aroma were more likely to be accepted by consumers. The hybrids that were clustered with landraces such as NARITA 7 showed similarity in the characteristics, which implied that their sensory quality was not different from that of the landraces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, most hybrids were characterized as being excessively hard by touch and firm in the mouth, which are attributes not preferred by consumers, as reported by other authors. 8,21 During the assessment of relevant traits for selection of new cooking banana genotypes, Tumuhimbise et al 22 emphasized the possession of acceptable sensory attributes alongside yield and resistance to diseases as a critical requisite, suggesting that new cultivars with a high yellow intensity, a uniformly distributed yellow color, and a good matooke aroma were more likely to be accepted by consumers. The hybrids that were clustered with landraces such as NARITA 7 showed similarity in the characteristics, which implied that their sensory quality was not different from that of the landraces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Matooke genotypes that lack yellow color are often rated inferior to the landrace varieties and rejected. [43][44][45] Consumers of steamed matooke associate yellow color with good taste and, if the product's color does not match consumer expectation, consumers will regard the product to taste differently and substandard. 23 This explains, along with several other relevant traits, the wide differences in overall liking scores between the hybrids and landraces in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The yellow color of the steamed matooke product influences consumers’ opinions of its taste and softness by touch, as well as a willingness to choose the variety with that particular color. Matooke genotypes that lack yellow color are often rated inferior to the landrace varieties and rejected 43–45 . Consumers of steamed matooke associate yellow color with good taste and, if the product's color does not match consumer expectation, consumers will regard the product to taste differently and substandard 23 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Matooke users (farmers, traders, and consumers) prefer genotypes with big compact bunches, and with big, long and straight or slightly curved fingers. However, Marimo et al 27 and Forysthe et al 28 showed that very long or very big fingers are difficult to handle when peeling and straight fingers are difficult to pack in boxes for export markets. These characteristics are the first visual impressions that influence users' choice of EAHCB genotypes, similarly reported by Tumuhimbise et al 26 and Madalla.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Marimo et al 27 . and Forysthe et al 28 . showed that very long or very big fingers are difficult to handle when peeling and straight fingers are difficult to pack in boxes for export markets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%