Assessing Neurocognition via Gamified Experimental Logic: A Novel Approach to Simultaneous Acquisition of Multiple ERPs

Abstract

The present study describes the development of a neurocognitive paradigm: “Assessing Neurocognition via Gamified Experimental Logic” (ANGEL), for performing the parametric evaluation of multiple neurocognitive functions simultaneously. ANGEL employs an audiovisual sensory motor design for the acquisition of multiple event related potentials (ERPs)—the C1, P50, MMN, N1, N170, P2, N2pc, LRP, P300, and ERN. The ANGEL paradigm allows assessment of 10 neurocognitive variables over the course of three “game” levels of increasing complexity ranging from simple passive observation to complex discrimination and response in the presence of multiple distractors. The paradigm allows assessment of several levels of rapid decision making: speeded up response vs. response-inhibition; responses to easy vs. difficult tasks; responses based on gestalt perception of clear vs. ambiguous stimuli; and finally, responses with set shifting during challenging tasks. The paradigm has been tested using 18 healthy participants from both sexes and the possibilities of varied data analyses have been presented in this paper. The ANGEL approach provides an ecologically valid assessment (as compared to existing tools) that quickly yields a very rich dataset and helps to assess multiple ERPs that can be studied extensively to assess cognitive functions in health and disease conditions.

Spatiotemporal dynamics in human visual cortex rapidly encode the emotional content of faces

“…By restricting ourselves to a linear classifier, we ensure that the decoder focuses on information explicitly present in the neural activity, as the feature vector is only a linear transformation away from the neural data (King & Dehaenene, 2014; Ritchie & Carlson, 2016). However, it remains an open question whether the brain uses similar mechanisms in its own computations, whether non‐classifiable responses are otherwise represented in the brain, or indeed whether there is a causal link between such neural responses and perception or behavior.…”

Adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation for Movement Disorders: The Long Road to Clinical Therapy

“…A significant proportion of patients are unsuitable for rechargeable IPG systems,19 and those that are would benefit from the ability to recharge less frequently. However, perhaps the most exciting impact of reduced power demands might be the possibility of reducing rechargeable battery size sufficiently to enable skull mounted IPGs 20–22…”

Model-based Bayesian signal extraction algorithm for peripheral nerves

“…With the goal of extracting signals at the fascicular level, we want to discriminate signals separated by 500 μm, as most fascicles in the upper limb nerves of humans are roughly 500 μm [21]. The results in Fig.…”

“…The largest hurdle lies in the difference is anatomy; targeted human nerves have many more fascicles, and thus the algorithm may have to associate a given movement with more than one fascicle. Research suggests that functionally related fascicles course together in the nerve [21], thus as long as these functional groups are well separated in space the algorithm should be able to extract such sources. An in silico study investigating this problem has already been performed on the femoral nerve [23], demonstrating the ability to translate this technology to more anatomically complex nerves.…”