Despite decades of domination by a few large companies, the American beer market has seen a dramatic resurgence of microbreweries. Contrary to conventional oligopolistic market theories, small firms have consistently gained market share from their entrenched competitors. Researchers have attributed this success to 'neolocalism.' Through their marketing, microbreweries appeal to consumers' desire for connections to real people and distinctive products from local places. However, no study has verified whether this pattern is most characteristic of microbreweries. With newer firms threatening their market share, larger firms might adopt neolocal claims, but little empirical attention has been directed at large brewers, and mid-sized, regional firms have been largely ignored by researchers. This paper uses content analysis of beer packaging to investigate the nature of the appeals made to consumers. I find that while microbreweries do make neolocal claims, regional breweries are more likely to associate their products with places on a local scale. Large breweries make few such claims, but instead rely on 'reflexive branding': marketing that refers back to the brand itself rather than borrowing existing symbolism from people or places. These findings partly support the neolocal perspective, but also challenge our expectations of which firms use neolocal appeals the most. From microbreweries to megabreweries and back again Recent years have witnessed remarkable growth in the popularity of microbreweries in the US. Considerable research has explored the appeal these small breweries hold for consumers and provided several possible explanations. However, most of this research has been directed at microbreweries themselves. It remains to be seen whether these patterns are really distinct to them, or if similar patterns occur among larger brewers as well. The current study contributes to our understanding of microbrewery appeal, and therefore also to issues of identity and culture linked to that appeal, by systematically comparing marketing techniques across brewery types to determine what differences exist across them. Before turning to this comparison, it is important to first understand the history of the beer market and the remarkable shifts it has experienced over the years. Beer has been an important part of American life since its early years as a colony. Colonists saw beer as essential for survival. It was safer than water, which was frequently contaminated by deadly pathogens like cholera, and more filling to boot (Smith 1998). For these reasons, breweries were widespread. Often, local governments encouraged the establishment of taverns (which also served as inns) and breweries, considering them essential to the economic and social health of a colony and beer itself essential to the health of individuals. A brewery was among the first structures built when a new colony was founded, and these multiplied as colonies grew. The precise number of breweries in existence during these early years is unknown since, in addit...