2021
DOI: 10.2166/washdev.2021.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing national WaSH targets through a water governance lens: a case study of the Sanitation and Water for All partnership commitments

Abstract: Dysfunctional water, sanitation and hygiene (WaSH) systems are mainly determined by poor water governance, exacerbating inequalities and poverty. Multi-stakeholder partnerships provide an approach to more flexible and adaptive governance to explore these problems. In this article, national commitments made to improve WaSH, made through the Sanitation and Water for All (SWA) partnership's Mutual Accountability Mechanism, are examined through qualitative content analysis and guided by the SMART framework to asse… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The conventional solution to poorly managed onsite sanitation and/or open defecation is for the government to provide adequate sanitation at subsidized prices or impose regulations requiring sanitation workers, house owners and occupiers to meet certain minimal sanitation standards [18]. In affluent urban settlements, this is usually relatively straightforward to organize and agree on politically [22,23]. However, few governments in LMICs are able to subsidize prices to the point where people living in informal settlements can afford [18,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conventional solution to poorly managed onsite sanitation and/or open defecation is for the government to provide adequate sanitation at subsidized prices or impose regulations requiring sanitation workers, house owners and occupiers to meet certain minimal sanitation standards [18]. In affluent urban settlements, this is usually relatively straightforward to organize and agree on politically [22,23]. However, few governments in LMICs are able to subsidize prices to the point where people living in informal settlements can afford [18,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%