2003
DOI: 10.1080/09695940301692
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing Multiliteracies and the New Basics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
71
0
12

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
71
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…The employments of digital technologies in classrooms are recurrently referred to in favourable terms, but there are also more sceptical views on how much technologies actually change practices. The more promising voices indicate results of increasing motivation (e.g., Papastergion, 2009;Uschioda, 2011;Yang & Wu, 2012), more personalized learning, and variations in teaching methods (e.g., Buckingham, 2013;Collins & Halverson, 2009;Kalantzis, Cope, & Harvey, 2010). While researchers that formulate a more sceptical view argue that above all it is important to realize that due to the complex practice of schooling, the use of technologies does not automatically imply development in a more fundamental sense (Andersson et.…”
Section: Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The employments of digital technologies in classrooms are recurrently referred to in favourable terms, but there are also more sceptical views on how much technologies actually change practices. The more promising voices indicate results of increasing motivation (e.g., Papastergion, 2009;Uschioda, 2011;Yang & Wu, 2012), more personalized learning, and variations in teaching methods (e.g., Buckingham, 2013;Collins & Halverson, 2009;Kalantzis, Cope, & Harvey, 2010). While researchers that formulate a more sceptical view argue that above all it is important to realize that due to the complex practice of schooling, the use of technologies does not automatically imply development in a more fundamental sense (Andersson et.…”
Section: Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This logic would suggest new curricular priorities or 'new basics' as demanded by the changing nature of work (Kalantzis, Cope & Harvey, 2003), and more conscious effort to disrupt traditional curricular settlements (Morgan, 2011;Foundation for Young Australians, n.d.) in line with the new economic conditions. In the absence or demise of such curricular innovation (Lingard & McGregor, 2014), this policy explanation could be critiqued for having failed to recognise the increasingly uncertain and precarious nature of work available to school leavers, or to reimagine the curriculum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having theoretical knowledge of pedagogy is insufficient for effective teaching. It has been documented for many years that there is a disparity between theory and practice in teacher education and student teachers experienced reality shock and complained about the limited relevance of teacher education to real teaching at schools (Allen, 2009;Barone, Berliner, Blanchard, Casanova, & McGowan, 1996;Cochran-Smith, 2005;Kalantzis, Cope, & Harvey, 2003;Korthagen, Loughran & Russell 2006;Louden et al, 2005;Neville, Sherman, & Cohen, 2005;Sandlin, Young, & Karge, 1992;Veenman, 1984). How to help teachers to put theory into practice has become a major concern of teacher educators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%