2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jada.2011.06.091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing Motivation for Eating and Intuitive Eating in Military Service Members

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As an example, some studies used weight as an outcome variable 2,3,33,36,55,[57][58][59]62,[65][66][67]69,[71][72][73] whereas others did not. 61,63,64 Some researchers used the nondiet approach of intuitive eating 2,3,36,57,59,63,66,67,72,74 whereas others used mindful eating 55,61,64,65 and yet others articulated their intervention with HAES 33,62,69,71,73 or the Satter Eating Competence Model. 60 Restraint and/or disinhibition were variables measured individually or together in some studies, 2,3,33,36,55,57,62,66,71 whereas other studies did not measure these behaviors.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As an example, some studies used weight as an outcome variable 2,3,33,36,55,[57][58][59]62,[65][66][67]69,[71][72][73] whereas others did not. 61,63,64 Some researchers used the nondiet approach of intuitive eating 2,3,36,57,59,63,66,67,72,74 whereas others used mindful eating 55,61,64,65 and yet others articulated their intervention with HAES 33,62,69,71,73 or the Satter Eating Competence Model. 60 Restraint and/or disinhibition were variables measured individually or together in some studies, 2,3,33,36,55,57,62,66,71 whereas other studies did not measure these behaviors.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…60 Restraint and/or disinhibition were variables measured individually or together in some studies, 2,3,33,36,55,57,62,66,71 whereas other studies did not measure these behaviors. 59,61,[63][64][65]67,69,[73][74][75] These variables also lack consistency in terms used to describe the non-diet approach. A contributing factor was that various assessment tools were used to measure similar study variables, which make it challenging to offer generalized statements about validity and reliability.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%