2020
DOI: 10.3390/ijms21155183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing Molecular Docking Tools to Guide Targeted Drug Discovery of CD38 Inhibitors

Abstract: A promising protein target for computational drug development, the human cluster of differentiation 38 (CD38), plays a crucial role in many physiological and pathological processes, primarily through the upstream regulation of factors that control cytoplasmic Ca2+ concentrations. Recently, a small-molecule inhibitor of CD38 was shown to slow down pathways relating to aging and DNA damage. We examined the performance of seven docking programs for their ability to model protein-ligand interactions with CD38. A t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
40
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, AutoDock 4.2 suggested alternative poses for some of the compounds, than that obtained in AutoDock Vina. Interestingly, it has been reported by numerous studies that AutoDock Vina outperforms AutoDock 4.2 in pose prediction [ 69 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 ], which is why we rely on our presented AutoDock Vina poses and their respective protein-ligand interactions. Furthermore, a correlation has been suggested between Vina scores and in vitro pIC 50 values [ 100 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, AutoDock 4.2 suggested alternative poses for some of the compounds, than that obtained in AutoDock Vina. Interestingly, it has been reported by numerous studies that AutoDock Vina outperforms AutoDock 4.2 in pose prediction [ 69 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 ], which is why we rely on our presented AutoDock Vina poses and their respective protein-ligand interactions. Furthermore, a correlation has been suggested between Vina scores and in vitro pIC 50 values [ 100 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, it has been reported by numerous studies that AutoDock Vina outperforms AutoDock 4.2 in pose prediction [ 69 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 ], which is why we rely on our presented AutoDock Vina poses and their respective protein-ligand interactions. Furthermore, a correlation has been suggested between Vina scores and in vitro pIC 50 values [ 100 ]. Vina has previously yielded multiple active ligands in vitro [ 101 , 102 , 103 , 104 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ID1 and UDCA structures were prepared using AutoDockTools 1.5.6 (Molecular Graphics Laboratory, CA). The docking parameters were set as previously described 17 . The optimal docking result was visualized using PyMOL software (The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 2.0 Schrödinger, LLC).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PLANTS has also been compared to other docking tools, among them are [ 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 ]. In [ 16 ], for instance PLANTS has been tested on the human cluster of differentiation 38 (CD38), in the ranking based on scoring power with 42 compounds PLANTS was in the upper class.…”
Section: Ant Intelligence In Molecular Docking With Plantsmentioning
confidence: 99%