2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing minipig compact jawbone quality at the microscale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further details about the background subtraction and peak‐fitting steps can be found elsewhere. [ 25 , 35 ) Representative background corrected Raman spectra for each biopsy can be found in the Supporting Information (Fig. S4 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further details about the background subtraction and peak‐fitting steps can be found elsewhere. [ 25 , 35 ) Representative background corrected Raman spectra for each biopsy can be found in the Supporting Information (Fig. S4 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All spectra were background-subtracted (second-order polynomial fit for local minima) and corrected for cosmic rays (Anton Paar instrument software v1.4 in-build function) while no smoothing was applied. Peaks of interest representing mineral and collagen content were further fit with the Lorentzian function superposition using a least square scheme (scipy.optimize.leastsq) ( Kochetkova et al, 2022 , Kochetkova et al, 2021 ). The ratio of the secondary phosphate (v 2 PO 4 , 410–460 cm −1 ) over the amide III (1215–1300 cm −1 ) bands was used as an indirect estimation of the bone mineralization level, as suggested by Roschger et al ( Roschger et al, 2014 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%