2016
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167884
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing Microstructural Substrates of White Matter Abnormalities: A Comparative Study Using DTI and NODDI

Abstract: Neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI) enables more specific characterization of tissue microstructure by estimating neurite density (NDI) and orientation dispersion (ODI), two key contributors to fractional anisotropy (FA). The present work compared NODDI- with diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)-derived indices for investigating white matter abnormalities in a clinical sample. We assessed the added value of NODDI parameters over FA, by contrasting group differences identified by both models. D… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
69
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(47 reference statements)
4
69
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas these measures have been suggested as sensitive features of WM microstructure, changes in their values may not be attributed to changes in specific tissue microstructure substrates23. NODDI and RSI are complementary approaches based on multi-compartment models of diffusion2343, and may provide microstructural indices with higher specificity compared to conventional diffusion MRI metrics2344. However, the application of such multi-compartment models on the single-shell data included in this study, although technically feasible45, is suboptimal23, and future work should strongly consider additionally including complementary diffusion measures derived using multiple-shell diffusion MRI data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas these measures have been suggested as sensitive features of WM microstructure, changes in their values may not be attributed to changes in specific tissue microstructure substrates23. NODDI and RSI are complementary approaches based on multi-compartment models of diffusion2343, and may provide microstructural indices with higher specificity compared to conventional diffusion MRI metrics2344. However, the application of such multi-compartment models on the single-shell data included in this study, although technically feasible45, is suboptimal23, and future work should strongly consider additionally including complementary diffusion measures derived using multiple-shell diffusion MRI data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A registration pipeline similar to that proposed by Timmers et. al (Timmers et al, 2016) was used. Briefly, a population-specific template was obtained with DTI-TK software (available on http://www.nitrc.org/projects/dtitk).…”
Section: Post-processing 251 Image Registrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The threshold limit value of this skeleton was set to 0.4 in order reduce bias due to cross subject variability of the WM tracts. Finally, the participant-specific transformation fields, obtained during the tensor-based transformation, were used to normalize all the other diffusion metrics used in this study as specified by Timmers et al in supplementary methods (Timmers et al, 2016).…”
Section: Post-processing 251 Image Registrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher shell value of b = 2000 was excluded as the diffusion signal at this b-value is no longer suitable for modeling diffusion tensors. 35 The tensor was fit to the combined shell data using fits a diffusion tensor model at each voxel (DTIFIT) and the output FA, MD, RD, and AD maps were included in the TBSS analysis. For the analysis of NODDI metrics, diffusion data from both acquisitions were combined using all shells.…”
Section: Mri Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%