2002
DOI: 10.2166/wqrj.2002.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing Metal Mine Effects using Benthic Invertebrates for Canada's Environmental Effects Program

Abstract: In Canada, the Metal Mining Effluent Regulation is a mechanism developed from the Fisheries Act (R.S., c. F-14, s.1) under which the effects of mine effluent on fish and fish habitat (i.e., benthic invertebrate communities) is determined by Environmental Effects Monitoring (EEM) studies. The Metal Mining EEM (MM EEM) program proceeds in a tiered manner, commencing with determining whether an effect is present and continuing with determining extent, magnitude and cause of the effect. The benthic invertebrate mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(41 reference statements)
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The nature of the baseline and surveillance monitoring tiers is determined in part by the physical setting of the facility and associated discharge (e.g., discharge to a stream, lake, or marine embayment; see Glozier et al [2002] and Environment Canada [2012] for details). By contrast, the study design (also known as the experimental design or sampling design) is often determined by answers to a series of relatively simple questions (e.g., Green 1979;Quinn and Keough 2002;Underwood 1994).…”
Section: Study Designs In Eemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The nature of the baseline and surveillance monitoring tiers is determined in part by the physical setting of the facility and associated discharge (e.g., discharge to a stream, lake, or marine embayment; see Glozier et al [2002] and Environment Canada [2012] for details). By contrast, the study design (also known as the experimental design or sampling design) is often determined by answers to a series of relatively simple questions (e.g., Green 1979;Quinn and Keough 2002;Underwood 1994).…”
Section: Study Designs In Eemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, Environment Canada acknowledged that the RCA (Figure 2) could be used as an alternate design in EEM (Glozier et al 2002;Environment Canada 2012). As a result, Environment Canada acknowledged that the RCA (Figure 2) could be used as an alternate design in EEM (Glozier et al 2002;Environment Canada 2012).…”
Section: Reference Condition Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1; Glozier et al 2002). In the case of YT and ACT data sets, timed sampling did not allow calculation of density, so abundance, standardized by sampling effort, was used.…”
Section: Community Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This requirement includes monitoring the benthic macroinvertebrate (BMI) community (Walker et al 2003). BMI communities from sites exposed to mine effluent are compared to communities from unexposed reference areas and an effect is defined as a statistically significant difference between exposed and unexposed communities (Glozier et al 2002). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation