2006
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-005-0887-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing Measurement Properties of Two Single-item General Health Measures

Abstract: Our single-item, GSRH questions demonstrated good reproducibility, reliability, and strong concurrent and discriminant scale performance with an established health status measure.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
264
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 363 publications
(280 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
6
264
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in some cases, single-item questions are appropriate measures to use (DeSalvo et al, 2006). Our question differed from that of other studies in that our question was not limited to a defined period of 6 or 12 months (e.g., Aronsson et al, 2000), and it thus forced physicians to consider themselves as patients and better relate to situations where they would have recommended patients to take sick leave (Sendén et al, 2013).…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, in some cases, single-item questions are appropriate measures to use (DeSalvo et al, 2006). Our question differed from that of other studies in that our question was not limited to a defined period of 6 or 12 months (e.g., Aronsson et al, 2000), and it thus forced physicians to consider themselves as patients and better relate to situations where they would have recommended patients to take sick leave (Sendén et al, 2013).…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Finally, to control for leadership experience participants were asked (a) how many leadership positions they have held and (b) how many leadership positions they are currently in. Because these measures were direct, behavioral reports they were treated as single-item, indicators (DeSalvo et al, 2006;Wanous & Hudy, 2001). Pilot testing revealed an average test-retest reliability of .93 across the eight items.…”
Section: Control Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This item has consistently been found to possess strong psychometric properties compared to validated multiitem measures (25) and be a good predictor of mortality and health care utilization (26,27).…”
Section: General Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%