2022
DOI: 10.29392/001c.57368
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing Malawi’s recent development of a National Oral Health Policy – learning for the future

Abstract: Background Policymakers in many low- and middle-income countries do not prioritize oral health and are inadequately informed about the burden of oral and maxillofacial problems, their connection with systemic health and the possible threat to human life. In Africa, the absence of oral health policies is a key problem contributing to increased oral disease burden, health workforce shortage, and inadequate oral health service provision. Context-relevant policies and research to determine needs and monitor progre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 22 Our findings can also assist in designing cost-effective initiatives to overcome the barriers, optimizing resource utilization, and enabling the effective adoption and implementation of the WHO Global Oral Health Strategy. 23 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 22 Our findings can also assist in designing cost-effective initiatives to overcome the barriers, optimizing resource utilization, and enabling the effective adoption and implementation of the WHO Global Oral Health Strategy. 23 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 Our findings can also assist in designing cost-effective initiatives to overcome the barriers, optimizing resource utilization, and enabling the effective adoption and implementation of the WHO Global Oral Health Strategy. 23 Some limitations of this review relate to the complexity in nature, design, and availability of articles to be retrieved. For example, preliminary piloting of potentially eligible articles proved that barriers and facilitators are widely reported, often not explicitly labeled as such, and rarely supported with references or data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%