Assessing local vulnerability to climate change in Ecuador

Abstract

Vulnerability assessments have become necessary to increase the understanding of climate-sensitive systems and inform resource allocation in developing countries. Challenges arise when poor economic and social development combines with heterogeneous climatic conditions. Thus, finding and harmonizing good-quality data at local scale may be a significant hurdle for vulnerability research. In this paper we assess vulnerability to climate change at a local level in Ecuador. We take Ecuador as a case study as socioeconomic data are readily available. To incorporate the spatial and temporal pattern of the climatic variables we use reanalysis datasets and empirical orthogonal functions. Our assessment strategy relies on the statistical behavior of climatic and socioeconomic indicators for the weighting and aggregation mechanism into a composite vulnerability indicator. Rather than assuming equal contribution to the formation of the composite indicator, we assume that the weights of the indicators vary inversely as the variance over the cantons (administrative division of Ecuador). This approach captures the multi-dimensionality of vulnerability in a comprehensive form. We find that the least vulnerable cantons concentrate around Ecuador’s largest cities (e.g. Quito and Guayaquil); however, approximately 20 % of the national population lives in other cantons that are categorized as highly and very highly vulnerable to climate change. Results also show that the main determinants of high vulnerability are the lack of land tenure in agricultural areas and the nonexistence of government-funded programs directed to environmental and climate change management.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40064-015-1536-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Assessing Risks from Cyclones for Human Lives and Livelihoods in the Coastal Region of Bangladesh

“…The first PCA component contributing to this vulnerability dimension is composed of indicators related to social security and citizen’s socio-economic opportunity that decrease vulnerability to natural hazards. People who have better jobs, better access to safe drinking water, better housing can recover earlier from cyclone impact than those that do not have such opportunities [ 66 , 67 , 68 ]. Higher education level increases the level of understanding to warning signals and the opportunity to get jobs that leads to lower vulnerability [ 53 ].…”

“…Those common variables are included in our first vulnerability dimension group. The role of variables such as the family size, the ratio of dependent people on the overall vulnerability index construction are justified by literature [ 10 , 56 , 68 ]. For all factors, the actual sign was not always obvious, as several parameters, including some with ambiguous relation with vulnerability, had significant loading.…”

Mountain Farming Systems’ Exposure and Sensitivity to Climate Change and Variability: Agroforestry and Conventional Agriculture Systems Compared in Ecuador’s Indigenous Territory of Kayambi People

“…In the case of the Andean region, some inner tropics studies also report a decrease of hail events during recent decades [57], while outer tropics studies indicate both increases and reductions in the number of hailstorm events without consistent trends, and also highlight the site-specific dependence (region, topography, altitude, latitude, longitude) of this type of climatic event [58][59][60][61]. Furthermore, although farmers' perceptions about increased incidence of heavy windstorms, droughts/dry periods, and heat waves/warm periods are clearly aligned with scientific observations and projections [17,20,22,54,[62][63][64], the perceptions of cold periods/frost increments differ with scientific observations and projections, which show a robust reduction [17,21,45,54].…”

Developing Composite Indicators for Flood Vulnerability Assessment: Effect of Weight and Aggregation Techniques

“…Iyengar and Sudarshan [21] developed a statistically sound and well-suited method to create a composite indicator from multivariate data in order to rank the economic performance of the districts in India. This method has been used by [4], [25], [26]. Let y ij , represent the normalised value of the j th indicator and the i th state (i = 1, 2, …, m; j = 1, 2, …, k), the indicator I i according to their respective factors, are then summed using ( 5), as in…”