2022
DOI: 10.1002/dta.3367
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing limits of detection in qualitative methods: A simple implementation of logistic regression in a web‐based R Shiny application environment and its potential in toxicology and doping control

Abstract: The estimation of limits of detection (LOD) for solely qualitative methods in analytical chemistry may prove challenging because all the approaches with which chemists are familiar require some type of numeric data input. The best model to describe the binary response in these methods (detected/not detected) is a logistic model; however, these models are not easily handled by most of the laboratories and generally demand expensive statistical software packages. In this work, the advantages of applying this app… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SPE approach was characterized concerning specificity, LOQ, carryover, matrix effects, precision, and reliability according to the above‐described protocols. Additionally, limit of identification was evaluated following the regression logistic approach presented by Garrido et al 29 Recovery was assessed by comparing ISTD‐normalized peak areas of three blank urine specimens each, fortified with 10 ng/mL of higenamine either before or after extraction of the test matrix, and the ISTD was added just prior to evaporation of the extraction solvent.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SPE approach was characterized concerning specificity, LOQ, carryover, matrix effects, precision, and reliability according to the above‐described protocols. Additionally, limit of identification was evaluated following the regression logistic approach presented by Garrido et al 29 Recovery was assessed by comparing ISTD‐normalized peak areas of three blank urine specimens each, fortified with 10 ng/mL of higenamine either before or after extraction of the test matrix, and the ISTD was added just prior to evaporation of the extraction solvent.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Limit of identification (LOI), the lowest concentration in which the TD2023IDCR criteria is met at 95% identification rate, was estimated by a sigmoid fit function approach. 23 The stability of the reconstituted samples maintained on autosampler at 20 C was assessed by the reinjection, after 24 and 48 h, of all samples prepared on the first day of validation. For evaluation of carryover, one urine sample with spiked cobalt at a concentration of 100 ng/mL was injected before two solvent blanks.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Sample Digestionmentioning
confidence: 99%