“…IRE was therefore more than ever considered as part of the problem of what was called 'radicalism', if left un-ruled, or maintaining elements of its solution -if governed. On both sides of the language border, measures were taken in the light of newly formed 'de-radicalization policies', with a renewed focus on the long-standing question of the education of IRE teachers (Franken, 2018: 133;Lafrarchi, 2020). In line with Mavelli (2012) and Croft (2012), the potential of violent radicalization that was attributed to young Muslim citizens 'with a lack of resilience' (Vlaamse regering, 2015: 2, 17), legitimized exceptional, preventive measures that, rather than 'imposing the boundaries very clearly', seemed to demonstrate, moreover, the secular-religious ambiguity as described by Agrama (2012), in a way tightening instead of undermining the power of the state's rule of law in the process.…”