2021
DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2021.1957829
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing intravitreal anti-VEGF drug safety using real-world data: methodological challenges in observational research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…17,18 In the current clinical studies, it is controversial whether the anti-VEGF treatment of ocular diseases increases cardio-cerebrovascular events and presents a different risk in different anti-VEGF drugs. 19 Despite the conflicting results of the current studies, 20 many of them have demonstrated the need for vigilance against cardio-cerebrovascular adverse events associated with anti-VEGF therapy for ocular disease. This study further described the cardio-cerebrovascular risk of ranibizumab, bevacizumab, and aflibercept based on FAERS for providing a valuable complement evidence of drug safety.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…17,18 In the current clinical studies, it is controversial whether the anti-VEGF treatment of ocular diseases increases cardio-cerebrovascular events and presents a different risk in different anti-VEGF drugs. 19 Despite the conflicting results of the current studies, 20 many of them have demonstrated the need for vigilance against cardio-cerebrovascular adverse events associated with anti-VEGF therapy for ocular disease. This study further described the cardio-cerebrovascular risk of ranibizumab, bevacizumab, and aflibercept based on FAERS for providing a valuable complement evidence of drug safety.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Still, their pharmacokinetic and pharmacological properties suggest that the anti‐VEGF effect in the systemic circulation may carry a potential risk of serious cardio‐cerebrovascular–related adverse events 17,18 . In the current clinical studies, it is controversial whether the anti‐VEGF treatment of ocular diseases increases cardio‐cerebrovascular events and presents a different risk in different anti‐VEGF drugs 19 . Despite the conflicting results of the current studies, 20 many of them have demonstrated the need for vigilance against cardio‐cerebrovascular adverse events associated with anti‐VEGF therapy for ocular disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 In addition, CBC, a recombinant fusion protein with high affinity to all VEGF isoforms and placental growth factor (PIGF), was developed and approved in China in 2013 for the treatment of wet AMD, with definite clinical efficacy. 16 Although many studies [17][18][19] have emphasized that intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF drugs has a good effect on the treatment of CNV, it is an invasive procedure that suffers from some injection-related complications, such as intraocular infection, retinal detachment, and cataracts, which could lead to severe visual impairment. [20][21][22] In addition, the therapy requires multiple repeated injections, and the drugs are expensive, placing a financial strain on patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%