1994
DOI: 10.1002/tl.37219945806
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing interdisciplinary learning

Abstract: Assessment procedures vary widely from local to national models. This chapter surveys and evaluates recent developments in the assessment of interdisciplinary studies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A paradigm shift from a discipline-based science learning approach to an interdisciplinary approach provides a wide range of desirable educational benefits for students and teachers such as cognitive advancement and the improvement of affective domains (Field, Lee, & Field, 1994;Lattuca, Voigt, & Fath, 2004;Newell, 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A paradigm shift from a discipline-based science learning approach to an interdisciplinary approach provides a wide range of desirable educational benefits for students and teachers such as cognitive advancement and the improvement of affective domains (Field, Lee, & Field, 1994;Lattuca, Voigt, & Fath, 2004;Newell, 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the modern work today is characterized by interdisciplinary teamwork (Gero, 2016). Furthermore, the expectation is that interdisciplinary learning will contribute to the development of higher-order thinking skills (Field, Lee, & Field, 1994;Tsai, Chung, & Lou, 2017) and increase the motivation to study (Lattuca, Voight, & Fath, 2004).…”
Section: Stem Education: Definition and Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Too little is known about ways to quantify the qualities and outcomes of such programs. Field, Lee, and Field (1994) note the lack of concise assessment criteria tailored to interdisciplinary studies, although there is no shortage of theoretical and practical material on evaluating other types of higher education. Furthermore, the indicators of successful transdisciplinary training may not be realized until several years after the training period has ended.…”
Section: ᭤ Challenges and Opportunities Associated With Transdisciplimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such interviews and surveys include a variety of qualitative and quantitative measures that are administered during the time that students are enrolled in the training program. Examples of such measures are provided by Field, Lee, and Field (1994) and Mitrany and Stokols (2003). One limitation associated with process measures of transdisciplinary training is that they are locally designed and highly customized to the specific circumstances of the target program and therefore may not generalize widely to other academic settings beyond the immediate training context.…”
Section: ᭤ Assessing the Processes And Products Of Transdisciplinary mentioning
confidence: 99%