1991
DOI: 10.1007/bf00167532
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing individual differences in psychophysical functions

Abstract: Individual differences in psychophysical data are examined in an olfactory experiment using a group of sixteen children (9 year olds) and three different techniques: magnitude estimation (ME), reglets or sticks (RE) and finger span (FS). From the responses given in the three techniques Steven's functions were calculated. Group and individual fits to the power law are analyzed. Comparisons of all individual curves were also done and consistency of the subjects responses across techniques was examined. Results s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our aim here is to provide an explicit experimental test of Eerkens & Lipo's ACE model of artifact transmission. Although the assumptions of their model are based on previous experimental findings from psychophysics [28] , from where their 3% copying error assumption is derived, it is unclear (i) whether this 3% error threshold is uniform across a large population of individuals, or whether there is inter-individual variation in this threshold value (especially given previous findings of substantial individual variability in some perceptual psychometric functions [29] [30] ), and thus how any inter-individual variation affects the robustness of the model; (ii) whether this 3% threshold, originally obtained for simple lines or abstract geometric shapes, also applies to more realistic artifact shapes; and (iii) whether it is valid to simply extrapolate a single individual's perceptual error along successive transmission episodes, or whether there are unexpected dynamics introduced by the compounding of individual errors (Hamilton & Buchanan [31] , for example, argued that the compounding of errors causes chains to decrease in size, on average).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our aim here is to provide an explicit experimental test of Eerkens & Lipo's ACE model of artifact transmission. Although the assumptions of their model are based on previous experimental findings from psychophysics [28] , from where their 3% copying error assumption is derived, it is unclear (i) whether this 3% error threshold is uniform across a large population of individuals, or whether there is inter-individual variation in this threshold value (especially given previous findings of substantial individual variability in some perceptual psychometric functions [29] [30] ), and thus how any inter-individual variation affects the robustness of the model; (ii) whether this 3% threshold, originally obtained for simple lines or abstract geometric shapes, also applies to more realistic artifact shapes; and (iii) whether it is valid to simply extrapolate a single individual's perceptual error along successive transmission episodes, or whether there are unexpected dynamics introduced by the compounding of individual errors (Hamilton & Buchanan [31] , for example, argued that the compounding of errors causes chains to decrease in size, on average).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Según Coello, la ubicación del sitio responde a la existencia de ricas minas de metales preciosos ubicados en los caseríos de Cata, Hunchor y La Yesera, que se sustentaría por la ocurrencia de poblados que, posiblemente, se ocupaban de las minas situadas en las quebradas cercanas a esos caseríos. Además, es importante por su posición geográfica en el valle, pues «[…] se comunica con sus valles vecinos por dos quebradas; hacia el sur (Quilmaná por la quebrada de San Andrés) y al norte (La Vuelta) por la quebrada de Hunchor» (Coello 1991).…”
Section: Antecedentesunclassified