“…It is often difficult to derive a clear understanding of the mechanisms affecting SWI directly from field-based investigation . The challenge of measuring and quantifying coastal aquifer hydrodynamics and SWI in field sites has promoted the use of laboratory and numerical modelling tools to gain a valuable insight into SWI response to various geological and/or hydrological stresses, such as (a) change in seaward freshwater discharge resulting from fluctuations at the inland head boundary (Abdoulhalik & Ahmed, 2017a; Abdoulhalik & Ahmed, 2017b; Abdoulhalik, Ahmed, & Hamill, 2017; Goswami & Clement, 2007;Robinson, Ahmed, & Hamill, 2016;Robinson, Hamill, & Ahmed, 2015) in head-controlled systems or from variations of the regional freshwater flux (Chang & Clement, 2012;Stoeckl & Houben, 2012;Stoeckl, Houben, & Dose, 2015) in flux-controlled systems and (b) SLR (Hussain & Javadi, 2016;Morgan, Bakker, & Werner, 2015;Morgan, Stoeckl, Werner, & Post, 2013). Goswami and Clement (2007) provided a thorough quantitative analysis of the steady state and transient toe response to freshwater head changes to provide an improved benchmark for numerical models.…”