2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jher.2016.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing impacts of sea level rise on seawater intrusion in a coastal aquifer with sloped shoreline boundary

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So, the increase in permeability is responsible for the increase in the degree of movement of the iso-contours of the seawater wedge. Similar conclusion is achieved by Hussain and Javadi [42].…”
Section: Toe Position In Different Scenariossupporting
confidence: 89%
“…So, the increase in permeability is responsible for the increase in the degree of movement of the iso-contours of the seawater wedge. Similar conclusion is achieved by Hussain and Javadi [42].…”
Section: Toe Position In Different Scenariossupporting
confidence: 89%
“…It is often difficult to derive a clear understanding of the mechanisms affecting SWI directly from field-based investigation . The challenge of measuring and quantifying coastal aquifer hydrodynamics and SWI in field sites has promoted the use of laboratory and numerical modelling tools to gain a valuable insight into SWI response to various geological and/or hydrological stresses, such as (a) change in seaward freshwater discharge resulting from fluctuations at the inland head boundary (Abdoulhalik & Ahmed, 2017a; Abdoulhalik & Ahmed, 2017b; Abdoulhalik, Ahmed, & Hamill, 2017; Goswami & Clement, 2007;Robinson, Ahmed, & Hamill, 2016;Robinson, Hamill, & Ahmed, 2015) in head-controlled systems or from variations of the regional freshwater flux (Chang & Clement, 2012;Stoeckl & Houben, 2012;Stoeckl, Houben, & Dose, 2015) in flux-controlled systems and (b) SLR (Hussain & Javadi, 2016;Morgan, Bakker, & Werner, 2015;Morgan, Stoeckl, Werner, & Post, 2013). Goswami and Clement (2007) provided a thorough quantitative analysis of the steady state and transient toe response to freshwater head changes to provide an improved benchmark for numerical models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adverse impact of SLR on SWI has been well documented in the literature (Chang, Clement, Simpson, & Lee, 2011;Ketabchi et al, 2016;Ketabchi, Mahmoodzadeh, Ataie-Ashtiani, Werner, & Simmons, 2014;Michael, Russoniello, & Byron, 2013;Watson, Werner, & Simmons, 2010;Werner & Simmons, 2009). Hussain and Javadi (2016) showed that SLR significantly enhances the inland progression of saline water and caused a substantial reduction of the available fresh groundwater resources, particularly for flat-shoreline aquifer systems. The type of inland boundary condition was found to play a major role in determining the vulnerability of a coastal aquifer to SWI induced by SLR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In autumn-winter, the intrusion front was landward biased, and in spring-summer season, it moved seawards. Hussain and Javadi (2016) showed that the extent of seawater intrusion in flat-bottomed sloped aquifers is greater than that in steepbottomed sloped aquifers. Furthermore, flat-bottomed sloped aquifers need shorter durations to reach steady state than steep-bottomed sloped aquifers.…”
Section: Salinization/seawater Intrusion Of Coastal Reservoirsmentioning
confidence: 99%