2009
DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdp067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing IDU prevalence and health consequences (HCV, overdose and drug-related mortality) in a primary care trust: implications for public health action

Abstract: Locally specific and useful intelligence on injecting and its health consequence can be generated to inform local public health action, and may contribute information to validate national prevalence estimates.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
47
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
47
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In Bristol and Walsall, size estimation data suggest that the PWID population has decreased by between 10% and 30% between 2009 and 2011. [104][105][106]108 Concurrently, survey data 44,70,73,88,89 suggest that the proportion of PWID injecting for > 10 years has increased, whereas the proportion injecting for between 3 and 10 years has decreased ( Figure 18). There has been little change in the proportion injecting for < 3 years.…”
Section: Model Calibration and Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Bristol and Walsall, size estimation data suggest that the PWID population has decreased by between 10% and 30% between 2009 and 2011. [104][105][106]108 Concurrently, survey data 44,70,73,88,89 suggest that the proportion of PWID injecting for > 10 years has increased, whereas the proportion injecting for between 3 and 10 years has decreased ( Figure 18). There has been little change in the proportion injecting for < 3 years.…”
Section: Model Calibration and Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the presence of two or more datasets, like registration lists, C-RC can be used to estimate the size of the noncaptured part of the population (e.g., persons not in treatment) and then of the total population, being the sum of all captured and non-captured persons. In many countries, C-RC has been applied to estimate the national, regional, or local number of problem drug users (Comiskey, 2001;Hickman et al, 2006Hickman et al, , 2009Stimson, Hickman, Quirk, Frischer, & Taylor, 1997;Vaissade & Legleye, 2009). Sometimes crack users are included in the estimated number of problem drug users, a target population that is often estimated through C-RC in Europe.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our method over-selects injectors who may be engaged in greater injecting risk and this may have diluted the comparisons. Future studies may employ respondent-driven sampling methods to reduce this possible source of bias [5]. A further limitation was that, in non-IDUs, we intended to conduct a case-control study but we could not identify an appropriate control group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of problem drug users has recently been estimated to be about 8500, with 3280-5540 IDUs [5], equivalent to 1 . 3-2 .…”
Section: Outbreak Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%