2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing high risk of suicide amongst physicians and nurses in treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
6
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies found that medical staff were in higher risk of suicide than general population ( 37 ), and the suicide rates among medical staff have been on the rise in the recent years ( 38 ). When we compared our results with prior studies, the prevalence of suicidal ideation in our study was roughly similar with other studies that were conducted among medical staff ( 39 ). Possible reasons may be that medical staff are at an increased occupational-specific risk about workplace violence, burnout, and medical errors, which can heighten the suicidal ideation among medical staff ( 40 , 41 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Previous studies found that medical staff were in higher risk of suicide than general population ( 37 ), and the suicide rates among medical staff have been on the rise in the recent years ( 38 ). When we compared our results with prior studies, the prevalence of suicidal ideation in our study was roughly similar with other studies that were conducted among medical staff ( 39 ). Possible reasons may be that medical staff are at an increased occupational-specific risk about workplace violence, burnout, and medical errors, which can heighten the suicidal ideation among medical staff ( 40 , 41 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Multiple studies included using population-based data capture, linkage of multiple data sources across health care and work disability systems, incorporated long follow-up periods beyond the period of work disability, utilised healthy community or other comparison groups, or adjusted statistical estimates for multiple potential confounding factors including health status prior to work disability. There are also quality issues in some studies, for example studies reporting only descriptive statistics (29), cross-sectional studies (49,51,60,61) and small sample sizes (29,47,51,61). Studies used a range of different outcome measures, and applied variety of statistical analysis techniques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three studies were conducted in specific occupational cohorts. These identified that physicians and nurses with a high risk of suicide were more frequently on sick leave when admitted to an inpatient treatment program (47); that government employees with more than one sickness absence spell exceeding 3 days had more than 7 times higher mortality from suicide, while employees with more than 15 days sickness absence per annum had 3 times the odds of suicide (48); and that employees of a healthcare organisation with sick leave during 2017 or 2018 had seven times the odds of recording a composite outcome encompassing suicide, self-harm or suicidal ideation, than employees with no sick leave spells (49).…”
Section: Intentional Self-harmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three studies were conducted in specific occupational cohorts. These identified that physicians and nurses with a high risk of suicide were more frequently on sick leave when admitted to an inpatient treatment program [48]; that government employees with more than one sickness absence spell exceeding 3 days had more than 7 times higher mortality from suicide, while employees with more than 15 days sickness absence per annum had 3 times the odds of suicide [49]; and that employees of a healthcare organisation with sick leave during 2017 or 2018 had seven times the odds of recording a composite outcome encompassing suicide, self-harm or suicidal ideation, than employees with no sick leave spells [50].…”
Section: Plos Global Public Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%