The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2016
DOI: 10.7220/2345-024x.18.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing Global Service-Learning: A Mixed-Methods Approach to Evaluating Students’ Intercultural Development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, the findings from this study validate other research that suggests that cultural immersion experience facilitates the construction, conception, and the development of self- identity [ 14 , 19 , 28 , 29 , 37 , 38 ]. The study further offers an in-depth insight into the process and pathways through which the transformation of perception and self-identity occurs before, during, and after cultural immersion experience.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Generally, the findings from this study validate other research that suggests that cultural immersion experience facilitates the construction, conception, and the development of self- identity [ 14 , 19 , 28 , 29 , 37 , 38 ]. The study further offers an in-depth insight into the process and pathways through which the transformation of perception and self-identity occurs before, during, and after cultural immersion experience.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…A significant aspect of the GSL program is that the participants, while living among the host community, engage in service projects within the community (Hartman and Kiely 2014). Studies show that GSL engagement promotes transformative learning and supports the development of global competence (Hartman and Kiely 2014;Hartman 2008;Jones et al 2016).…”
Section: Global Service Learning (Gsl)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, qualitative studies with a larger sample size collected data using open‐ended questions and coding procedures (Bell et al., 2016; Hessel, 2019). Sample sizes for mixed method research are as low as n = 6 (Jones, et al., 2016) and high as n = 221 (Fasching‐Varner et al., 2018) with the majority between n = 10 and n = 50. We remind readers that larger sample size does not necessarily result in greater quantitative rigor.…”
Section: Findings Of Systematic Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%