2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10584-012-0669-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing future climatic changes of rainfall extremes at small spatio-temporal scales

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
89
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
89
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A dry weather period of one day is required for two succeeding events to be considered as independent (Gregersen et al 2013b;Madsen et al 2002). For consistency with previous Danish studies (Gregersen et al 2013b;Madsen et al 2002) we apply a threshold which yields approximately three extreme events per year in the standard normal period of 1961-1990. Due to the highly variable nature of rainfall extremes it can be difficult to separate long term trends from random variations, when the evaluations are made on an annual basis. Ntegeka and Willems (2008) successfully applied a moving window of 5-15 years as a filter to enhance the multidecadal signal for extreme rainfall variations.…”
Section: Perturbation Factors For Extreme Rainfallmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A dry weather period of one day is required for two succeeding events to be considered as independent (Gregersen et al 2013b;Madsen et al 2002). For consistency with previous Danish studies (Gregersen et al 2013b;Madsen et al 2002) we apply a threshold which yields approximately three extreme events per year in the standard normal period of 1961-1990. Due to the highly variable nature of rainfall extremes it can be difficult to separate long term trends from random variations, when the evaluations are made on an annual basis. Ntegeka and Willems (2008) successfully applied a moving window of 5-15 years as a filter to enhance the multidecadal signal for extreme rainfall variations.…”
Section: Perturbation Factors For Extreme Rainfallmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are a number of reasons to question the quality of precipitation from coarse-resolution dynamical models, especially on hourly time scales. There can be large mean biases (Kjellström et al 2010), poor timing and durations , and incorrect spatial distributions (Gregersen et al 2013). One modeling study, that of Hanel and Buishand (2010), assessed hourly extremes simulated by the Ensemble-Based Predictions of Climate Changes and Their Impacts (ENSEMBLES) project 25-km parameterized-convection RCMs (Hewitt and Griggs 2004) over the Netherlands with the help of radar data, and found that the model-simulated generalized extremevalue distribution shape (location) parameters are too high (too low), leading to weaker short-return-period hourly extremes but overly intense long-return-period hourly extremes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assert the considerable uncertainties associated with future projections of changes in the frequency and intensity of extreme events, such projections are generally based on multi-model ensembles (van der Linden and Mitchell, 2009) rather than single model projections, combined with different statistical downscaling methods (Gregersen et al, 2013;Sunyer et al, 2014). Design intensities and "climate factors" (i.e.…”
Section: Projections Of Extreme Precipitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Design intensities and "climate factors" (i.e. the ratio between the expected future and present design rainfall) for extreme precipitation in Denmark under present and future conditions have previously been estimated from regional climate projections (Gregersen et al, 2013). Here we use recent results from the "RiskChange" project (Maule et al, 2014;Arnbjerg-Nielsen et al, 2015) to generate 15 different time series for design precipitation, each with a duration of 4 h and representing precipitation events from 5 to 100 year return values, using a Chicago Design Storm (CDS) rain calculator (IDA, 2014) (Table 1) for corresponding present-day and future climate conditions (2071-2100; RCP4.…”
Section: Projections Of Extreme Precipitationmentioning
confidence: 99%