2001
DOI: 10.1002/joc.677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing future changes in extreme precipitation over Britain using regional climate model integrations

Abstract: In a changing climate it is important to understand how all components of the climate system may change. For many impact sectors, particularly those relating to flooding and water resources, changes in precipitation intensity and amount are much more important than changes in temperature. This study assesses possible changes in extreme precipitation intensities estimated through both quantile and return period analysis over Britain. Results using a regional climate model (with greenhouse gas changes following … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

10
62
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
10
62
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is clear that the gridded data have biases that need to be considered in such evaluations, as in some cases mismatches between climate model output and observations may be partly due to inaccuracies in the observational data. It may be more prudent to evaluate RCMs against only those observational grid boxes that satisfy certain ''station density'' criteria, as for example Beniston et al (2007), Buonomo et al (2007), Huntingford et al (2003), Jones and Reid (2001) and Semmler and Jacob (2004) have done in the past. More remains to be done to ensure that over-smoothed gridded data do not result in an over-smoothing RCM being incorrectly selected as the best performing one in an evaluation of climate models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is clear that the gridded data have biases that need to be considered in such evaluations, as in some cases mismatches between climate model output and observations may be partly due to inaccuracies in the observational data. It may be more prudent to evaluate RCMs against only those observational grid boxes that satisfy certain ''station density'' criteria, as for example Beniston et al (2007), Buonomo et al (2007), Huntingford et al (2003), Jones and Reid (2001) and Semmler and Jacob (2004) have done in the past. More remains to be done to ensure that over-smoothed gridded data do not result in an over-smoothing RCM being incorrectly selected as the best performing one in an evaluation of climate models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some areas the station density is so high that only stations within each grid box are used to estimate the grid-box area-average. Some studies use these dense areas for the evaluation of RCMs (e.g., Beniston et al 2007;Buonomo et al 2007;Huntingford et al 2003;Jones and Reid 2001;Semmler and Jacob 2004), while for other areas, RCMs have been evaluated using gridded data developed with much sparser station networks. An example of climate model evaluation with gridded data developed with sparse station networks is the study by Christidis et al (2005), who use the gridded global daily temperature dataset developed by Caesar et al (2006) for the evaluation of their general circulation model (GCM).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, limiting the geographical domain of these atmospheric models reduces the total number of grid points and allows one to perform simulations at high resolutions with an affordable computational cost. Because of the ability of these high-resolution LAMs or RCMs to reproduce meaningful small-scale features over a limited region (Denis et al 2002;Giorgi et al 2004), they have become a popular tool in both the NWP and the climate community for studying extreme events at regional and local scales (e.g., Jones and Reid 2001;Buonomo et al 2007;Deque and Somot 2008;Duliere et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most recently, a few studies have used output from regional climate models (RCMs) to construct scenarios of extremes [97][98][99][100][101][102]. Durman et al [100], for example, focus on the occurrence of intense precipitation events over Europe and the UK defined using two different thresholds (15 mm per day and the upper 1% percentile calculated from the model control run).…”
Section: Recent Work On Scenario Development Methods For Extremesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparison is made of future scenarios (for 2080-2100) constructed from Hadley Centre HadCM2 GCM and RCM output in order to determine the added value of using high-resolution model output [100]. Jones and Reid [101] also use the HadCM2 RCM to construct future scenarios of extreme precipitation for the UK, in this case focusing on the occurrence of the top 10% quantile events (calculated using the method of Osborn et al [103]) and 5, 10, 20 and 50 year return period events. This RCM was also used by Booij [102] to construct scenarios of return period precipitation events for the Meuse catchment in western Europe and to compare these with HIRHAM4 RCM and three GCM-based scenarios.…”
Section: Recent Work On Scenario Development Methods For Extremesmentioning
confidence: 99%