2017
DOI: 10.1596/29326
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing Food Insecurity in Latin America and the Caribbean Using FAO’s Food Insecurity Experience Scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
13
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…GDP per capita is only statistically significant for NMNR counties, and correlates with lower food insecurity rates. This is consistent with previous literature in an international context which concludes higher GDP growth or GDP per capita is associated with lower incidences of food insecurity (FAO et al, 2012; Smith et al, 2017a, 2017b; Warr, 2014).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…GDP per capita is only statistically significant for NMNR counties, and correlates with lower food insecurity rates. This is consistent with previous literature in an international context which concludes higher GDP growth or GDP per capita is associated with lower incidences of food insecurity (FAO et al, 2012; Smith et al, 2017a, 2017b; Warr, 2014).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Of note, considering the complexity of food security, its assessment and finding comparable indicators applicable to various contexts remain challenging. 9,[15][16][17] This study also reported that those studies that had a lower sample size had a slightly higher level of food security as compared to those with larger sample sizes. The differences could be due to sampling factors such as chance effects.…”
Section: Meta-regressionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Considering the complexity of food security, its assessment and finding comparable indicators applicable to various contexts remain challenging. 9,[15][16][17] For example, some studies have relied on individual's 24-hour recall of food consumption, the Household Hunger Scale (HHS), the Household Food Security Scale Module (HFSSM), the Household Food Insecurity Access Scale (HFIAS), and the Household Consumption and Expenditure Surveys (HCES) among other methods in the assessment of food security [18][19][20]. Therefore, for greater accuracy and reliability it is vital to combine food security indicators that measure the different dimensions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this article, we use the FI Experience Scale (FIES) measure of experiential FI, as it is a powerful tool that assesses the prevalence and severity of FI around the world by directly measuring the access dimension developed by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). This measure of FI allows cross-country comparison and is valid in both developed and developing countries (Ballard, Kepple, and Cafiero 2013; Smith, Kassa, and Winters 2017; Smith, Rabbitt, and Coleman-Jensen 2017). To address the FI–migration relationship, we combine the FIES measure with data on migration flows between 198 origin countries and 16 OECD countries, creating the largest data set that has been applied to the investigation of the relationship between FI and international migration flows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%