2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2016.11.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing fixed depth carbon stocks in soils with varying horizon depths and thicknesses, sampled by horizon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The smallest amounts of fine roots were found in the pasture area, and as the depth increased, the mean values of fine roots decreased Figure 2. These lower values can be explained by the degree of degradation in the area, as with the reduction of vegetation coverage, the amounts of roots also decreased (Premrov et al, 2017). According to Andrade et al, (2020), the amount of fine roots in pasture area ranged from 5.33 to 25.83 g, which are within values found in this study.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The smallest amounts of fine roots were found in the pasture area, and as the depth increased, the mean values of fine roots decreased Figure 2. These lower values can be explained by the degree of degradation in the area, as with the reduction of vegetation coverage, the amounts of roots also decreased (Premrov et al, 2017). According to Andrade et al, (2020), the amount of fine roots in pasture area ranged from 5.33 to 25.83 g, which are within values found in this study.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Nevertheless, the higher standard deviation in the erosion profile indicates that SOC redistribution processes have observable variability over time. In any case, the older 14 C age of the deeper SOC pool suggests that the different composition of its organic material can have different contributions (Ellerbrock et al 2016; Premrov et al 2017) depending on slope position. Bioturbation can also influence the results of SOC-age models, especially if it has different intensity on middleslope and downslope sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soil organic carbon (SOC) concentrations were determined using the Walkley–Black method (Nelson & Sommers, 1996). The organic carbon density at each soil depth layer was calculated using the following equation (Premrov et al, 2017). The calculated values were converted into kg m −3 . SOCVD=()%C100*italicpf*CCF, Where : SOCVD is the volume‐based SOC density of the horizon (gC cm −3 ), % C is the C content in the fine earth (<2 mm), ρf is the soil bulk density of the fine‐earth material (g soil cm −3 ); CCF is the coarse fraction correction factor calculated using [(100 – % stones)/100].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soil organic carbon (SOC) concentrations were determined using the Walkley-Black method (Nelson & Sommers, 1996). The organic carbon density at each soil depth layer was calculated using the following equation (Premrov et al, 2017). The calculated values were converted into kg m À3 .…”
Section: Laboratory Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%