2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.quaint.2018.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing Fishtail points distribution in the southern Cone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides the sites discussed here, fishtail artifacts manufactured in quartz were recorded at a similar latitude in the Atlantic rim at the Tigre site (Uruguay) with ages between 12,640 and 12,320 cal BP [102, 103]. All these evidences lie within the expected spatial and chronological range distributions of fishtail points [29, 104, 105]. However, no workshop evidence has been described so far within well constrained chronological ranges.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Besides the sites discussed here, fishtail artifacts manufactured in quartz were recorded at a similar latitude in the Atlantic rim at the Tigre site (Uruguay) with ages between 12,640 and 12,320 cal BP [102, 103]. All these evidences lie within the expected spatial and chronological range distributions of fishtail points [29, 104, 105]. However, no workshop evidence has been described so far within well constrained chronological ranges.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…The spreading from northern South America might have been followed two main "routes": one through the Pacific slope and the Andean Cordillera in the west [186], and the other through Atlantic slope in the east [186,187]. In this scenario, despite it is located where the continent became narrower, and both "routes" may converge, in the colonization process of Patagonia, the FPs makers living at CM might belong to the major Pacific/Andean "route", and being one of the southernmost sites located in western South America witnessed by the finds of Salar Punta Negra [188], Quebrada Santa Julia [189], Valiente [190], Tagua-Tagua [191], and Salto Chico in Chile [167], and those FPs surficial finds performed in the Salta, Catamarca, Mendoza, Neuquén, and Río Negro provinces in Argentina (e.g., [192][193][194][195]).…”
Section: The Early Inhabitants Of the Cueva Del Medio And Consideratimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At Los Grifos rockshelter in Chiapas a waisted Clovis and a FPP were found in contexts dating to 10,378–9,555 calBP, and at Los Tapiales, an open air site in highland Guatemala, a fluted stem base was recovered from shallow excavations in contexts bracketed between 13,399–9,561 calBP [29,30]. Revised dates for NA Clovis that range from 13,250–12,800 calBP [31] to perhaps as early as 13,500 CalBP [32,33] and SA FPP from 12,900 to 11,500 calBP [34,35] indicate less than two centuries of overlap, placing SA on a separate trajectory from NA in developing lithic traditions. In western NA, Clovis is followed closely by the also short-lived (12,610 to 12,170 calBP) Folsom biface tradition [36], examples of which are not found in southern Mesoamerica or CA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%