Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing ecological status in karstic lakes through the integration of phytoplankton functional groups, morphological approach and environmental DNA metabarcoding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The highest production rates correspond to years of highest chironomid abundances, and the same goes for the years with lowest rates. Lake Kozjak is known to normally fluctuate between these two trophic states [43,61]. This study shows that in years of high chironomid emergence, up to 4400 mg m −2 y −1 of chironomid biomass is available to terrestrial animals either directly as prey or indirectly as carcasses that decay on the soil surface [62].…”
Section: Magnitude Of Chironomid Emergencementioning
confidence: 82%
“…The highest production rates correspond to years of highest chironomid abundances, and the same goes for the years with lowest rates. Lake Kozjak is known to normally fluctuate between these two trophic states [43,61]. This study shows that in years of high chironomid emergence, up to 4400 mg m −2 y −1 of chironomid biomass is available to terrestrial animals either directly as prey or indirectly as carcasses that decay on the soil surface [62].…”
Section: Magnitude Of Chironomid Emergencementioning
confidence: 82%
“…In addition, the use of environmental DNA (eDNA) as a biomonitoring method that can be used for the sampling of diatoms, macroinvertebrates, and multiple taxonomic groups from aquatic ecosystems in a non-destructive framework [137] arises mainly due to the limitations and bottlenecks described above (sampling bias, taxonomy skills, and time inefficiency) [30]. Furthermore, the eDNA method has been used to propose many objectives for diversity measurements in multiple taxa [138][139][140], integration of ecological status assessments [141], invasive alien species monitoring [108], and hypotheses such as the rivers being a kind of "biodiversity conveyor belts" across terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems [142].…”
Section: Omics In Freshwater Biomonitoring: a Multifaceted Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Environmental DNA metabarcoding technology is used for qualitative and quantitative analysis of organisms through collection of environmental samples, enrichment, DNA extraction, selection of molecular markers, design of universal primers for their amplification, and high-throughput sequencing. In recent years, eDNA technology has been used in various applications such as species diversity monitoring (Plough et al, 2018;Webster et al, 2020;Zou et al, 2020;Jia et al, 2021;DiBattista et al, 2022;Knudsen et al, 2022), invasive species detection, and biomass assessment (Tillotson et al, 2018;Fraija-Fernandez et al, 2020;Wang et al, 2020;Hanzek et al, 2021). The method has been used to detect target species (Baudry et al, 2021;Matthias et al, 2021;Brand et al, 2022;Ruppert et al, 2022), for example, in 2021 to detect giant catfish in the Mekong River (Osathanunkul, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%