2016
DOI: 10.1177/1362361315605972
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing early implementation of state autism insurance mandates

Abstract: In the United States, health insurance coverage for autism spectrum disorder treatments has been historically limited. In response, as of 2015, 40 states and Washington, DC, have passed state autism insurance mandates requiring many health plans in the private insurance market to cover autism diagnostic and treatment services. This study examined five states’ experiences implementing autism insurance mandates. Semi-structured, key-informant interviews were conducted with 17 participants representing consumer a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
22
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our finding regarding the effects of waivers on black‐white disparities stands in contrast to findings from studies of states’ autism insurance mandates that require private insurance plans to cover ASD assessment and treatment . Despite evidence that these mandates result in increased diagnosis of ASD, they have not been found to affect racial disparities in parent‐reported outcomes .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our finding regarding the effects of waivers on black‐white disparities stands in contrast to findings from studies of states’ autism insurance mandates that require private insurance plans to cover ASD assessment and treatment . Despite evidence that these mandates result in increased diagnosis of ASD, they have not been found to affect racial disparities in parent‐reported outcomes .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 97%
“…33 Our finding regarding the effects of waivers on black-white disparities stands in contrast to findings from studies of states' autism insurance mandates that require private insurance plans to cover ASD assessment and treatment. 34 Despite evidence that these mandates result in increased diagnosis of ASD, 35 they have not been found to affect racial disparities in parent-reported outcomes. 36 Medicaid HCBS waivers may have more effect on racial disparities among children with ASD than private insurance mandates because Medicaid-enrolled children with ASD use more services than those with private insurance, 37 providing them with more opportunities to receive care perceived as needed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 For example, children with higher levels of spending may have families with additional disposable income to pay for services, or children with lower levels of spending may reside in areas with limited provider supply 22 or have families that are less capable of advocating for their needs or are uncertain about which services are covered. 23 Such disparities could be exacerbated when ASD mandates are enacted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of the granular policy variations across states are lost from such analyses due to the independent variable being rolled up into a single categorical variable; for example, a state law is present or not present (e.g., Parish, Thomas, Rose, Kilany, & McConville, 2012). Even where more granular policy provisions are studied, the methods used to collect and assess the laws of interest remain unclear (Baller et al., 2016; Chatterji, Decker, Markowitz, 2015). Studying the variation in specific provisions may provide greater context for measuring the impact of the laws on specific outcomes (Johnson et al, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%