2007
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(07)60843-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing drug-related harm – Authors' reply

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some neuroscientists have argued that there is no neurobiological justification for the fact that alcohol and tobacco are legal while heroin, cocaine and cannabis are not (Nutt, King, Saulsbury, & Blakemore, 2007). The legal status of these drugs, they argue, is not correlated in any simple way with their effects on brain neurochemistry (Ashcroft, Campbell, & Capps, 2007;Nutt et al, 2007).…”
Section: Addiction Neurobiology and Illicit Drug Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some neuroscientists have argued that there is no neurobiological justification for the fact that alcohol and tobacco are legal while heroin, cocaine and cannabis are not (Nutt, King, Saulsbury, & Blakemore, 2007). The legal status of these drugs, they argue, is not correlated in any simple way with their effects on brain neurochemistry (Ashcroft, Campbell, & Capps, 2007;Nutt et al, 2007).…”
Section: Addiction Neurobiology and Illicit Drug Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These neuroscientists (e.g. Iversen, 2002;Nutt et al, 2007) have argued that policies towards licit and illicit drugs should better reflect their comparative harmfulness to users.…”
Section: Addiction Neurobiology and Illicit Drug Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Professor David Nutt (2007), also an ACMD member and co-author of a new index of harms table published in The Lancet, advised the Council that ecstasy, LSD and 4MTA should not be Class A drugs.…”
Section: Acmd To Consider Downgrading Ecstasymentioning
confidence: 99%