Assessing distribution and pattern of the earthquake-related deformation caused by large continental normal earthquakes using optical image correlation

Abstract

<p>Earthquakes on normal faults in the continental setting are relatively uncommon. The scarcity of surface-rupturing events underpins an absence of surface displacement measurements. It is a common practice to use surface offset as a proxy to understand the fault structure at depth. Hence, the lack of comprehensive surface data impedes the subsurface reconstruction of seismogenic normal faults and prohibits the thorough assessment of earthquake hazards. To supplement the available surface displacement measurements and to make statistically significant inferences, we apply optical image correlation (OIC) methods to historical images from three large continental normal earthquakes in the western United States (1954 Dixie Valley (M<sub>w</sub> 6.8) - Fairview Peak (M<sub>w</sub> 7.1) earthquake sequence, the 1959 M<sub>w</sub> 7.2 Hebgen Lake earthquake and the 1983 M<sub>w</sub> 6.9 Borah Peak earthquake). The results of this study are displacement maps with three components of deformation from which we extract high-resolution 3-d measurements everywhere along the surface rupture. </p> <p> </p> <p>The high-resolution 3-d data are used to quantify the magnitude and direction of the earthquake-related offset, the percentage of off-fault damage as well as the width of the fault zone. These parameters represent the fault maturity, geometric complexity and subsurface structure of the fault. Our observations confirm behaviours previously observed along strike-slip faults (e.g. magnitude of off-fault deformation is proportional to the rupture complexity). In addition, a comparative assessment of the results from the three study areas demonstrates that features such as excess slip detected close to the fault scarp are not unique and can be found along multiple dip-slip faults. Consequently, this study documents the variation of the quantifiable parameters along the normal faults. It suggests that while some parameters are a universal reflection of the fault characteristics, others vary according to the geology or topography in the area and should not be accepted without further investigation.</p>